Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GourmetDan
If it's not observable, it's not science.

I wouldn't call theoretical physics unscientific, but hey, whatever floats your boat.

Not at all. It is just as natural as is evolution and therefore has just as much role in science. Agreed?

Not at all. Kindly remember that you wrote "...it [evolution] just invokes naturalism instead of intelligent design." Based on your categorization, you admitted that intelligent design is not natural.

Thanks.

197 posted on 06/18/2007 4:02:19 PM PDT by Abd al-Rahiim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies ]


To: Abd al-Rahiim
"I wouldn't call theoretical physics unscientific, but hey, whatever floats your boat."

Well of course you wouldn't. You think that evolution is scientific and that is unobservable too. The fact that you are unable to recognize that theories must be observable, repeatable and falsifiable to be scientific doesn't mean that everyone must be so.

"Not at all. Kindly remember that you wrote "...it [evolution] just invokes naturalism instead of intelligent design." Based on your categorization, you admitted that intelligent design is not natural."

As you know, I said that man is coming close to designing new life forms himself. Now how could intelligent design not be natural if intelligent mankind is about to intelligently-design new life forms? Based on your categorization, you just admitted that mankind is supernatural.

That you are young and think that cutsie word games count as rational debate is becoming more evident.

200 posted on 06/18/2007 4:19:37 PM PDT by GourmetDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson