Skip to comments.
Girl takes down elephant with 83-lb bow
archerytalk ^
Posted on 06/08/2007 4:17:56 AM PDT by rickdylan
Girl kills elephant with 83-lb bow
One of the more unusual stories I've seen on the archery forums recently...
TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: animalrights; ar; archery; banglist; elephant; hunting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 241-257 next last
To: Lurker
True.
But I still hate her.
81
posted on
06/08/2007 7:58:14 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(JOIN THE NRA: https://membership.nrahq.org/forms/signup.asp)
To: blam
Gloating over a kill is about the same mind-set as an Islamist parading with a severed head.What is it when you have sex with the severed head?
I need a term I can tell my psychologist.
82
posted on
06/08/2007 7:59:24 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(JOIN THE NRA: https://membership.nrahq.org/forms/signup.asp)
To: indcons
It is a small African elephant....a calf that is probably less than a year old. Does the lsd help you make distinctions like that??
83
posted on
06/08/2007 8:03:57 AM PDT
by
jeddavis
To: rickdylan
You know where to 'stick-it.' Wow. What stunning reparté. I guess he told you.
BTW...given the toughness of an elephant's hide even at 12 yards...that must have been one hell of a good shot.
84
posted on
06/08/2007 8:06:43 AM PDT
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Don't question faith. Don't answer lies.)
To: jeddavis
I don’t know...haven’t tried it. You must know quite a lot about LSD. Are you a dealer?
85
posted on
06/08/2007 8:07:14 AM PDT
by
indcons
(Linda and Hugo Chavez - same goals, different methods)
To: rickdylan
I don’t know if she deserves a medal or a bullet.
86
posted on
06/08/2007 8:10:27 AM PDT
by
sagar
To: zeugma
“It’s worth noting that the only places they are endangered are those places where it is illegal to hunt them. “
Or it could be other way around. The only reason it is illegal to hunt them is because they were over-hunted in the first place. You can’t hunt wild animals anymore if they become endangered species.
87
posted on
06/08/2007 8:15:11 AM PDT
by
sagar
To: Lazamataz
What is it when you have sex with the severed head? Neckrophilia.
L
88
posted on
06/08/2007 8:22:23 AM PDT
by
Lurker
(Comparing moderate islam to extremist islam is like comparing small pox to plague.)
To: Abundy
“Virtually painless”?
Did you volunteer to test that theory out?
“Dying of dehydration is euphoric.”
“Unborn babies don’t feel pain when ripped limb from limb.”
89
posted on
06/08/2007 8:30:51 AM PDT
by
Politicalmom
(No self-respecting group bent on world domination would invite Angelina Jolie to be a member.)
To: rickdylan
She’s in trouble now. This elephant is not going to forget this!
90
posted on
06/08/2007 8:43:00 AM PDT
by
fish hawk
(The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
To: Eye of Unk
Some cave drawings?
I don't think you'll find any cro magnons with bows and arrows -- it's a relatively recent weapon. Early man primarily used spears to hunt.
The conversion of the spear into the javelin, as it was the most obvious, so probably it was the earliest step in advance. Close upon this followed the sling, and last the arrow and the bow. The invention of the latter weapon is ascribed by Pliny, to a son of Jupiter.
In the days of Homer it was the weapon of the gods; and thousands of years after, it was the pride and glory of the English yeoman.
The bow does not appear to have been extensively used in later times in either the Greek or Roman armies. The ferocious Spartan preferred the close combat with manual weapons, the Athenian won his glory upon the sea, and it was with the pike that Alexander overcame the hosts of Persia.
http://www.researchpress.co.uk/firearms/history/armsinvention.htm
91
posted on
06/08/2007 8:49:56 AM PDT
by
Beckwith
(dhimmicrats and the liberal media have chosen sides -- Islamofascism)
To: Lurker
92
posted on
06/08/2007 8:56:25 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(JOIN THE NRA: https://membership.nrahq.org/forms/signup.asp)
To: sagar
"Or it could be other way around. The only reason it is illegal to hunt them is because they were over-hunted in the first place. You cant hunt wild animals anymore if they become endangered species."
Or you could be wrong. The facts simply do not support your theory!
93
posted on
06/08/2007 9:50:58 AM PDT
by
728b
(Never cry over something that can not cry over you.)
To: 728b
“Or you could be wrong. The facts simply do not support your theory!”
But where is the evidence that hunting/poaching “protects” wild elephants?
You could argue the same line w.r.t. poaching as well. Since poachers “need” ivories, they wouldn’t want to wipe out elephants. So, poaching is good for the elephants.
94
posted on
06/08/2007 10:26:41 AM PDT
by
sagar
To: blam
Your post would be perfect, on the DU.
95
posted on
06/08/2007 10:34:24 AM PDT
by
DungeonMaster
(Render therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's.)
To: sagar
"But where is the evidence that hunting/poaching protects wild elephants?"
Nobody is offering any evidence that poaching "protects" anything. Only just now you equated the two. Do you believe that hunters are poachers?
"You could argue the same line w.r.t. poaching as well. Since poachers need ivories, they wouldnt want to wipe out elephants. So, poaching is good for the elephants."
I guess you could argue it but it does not hold water. Are you really trying to convince us that thieves are forward looking people?
Just because you could argue it does not mean the argument is reasoned.
96
posted on
06/08/2007 11:30:28 AM PDT
by
728b
(Never cry over something that can not cry over you.)
To: sagar
But where is the evidence that hunting/poaching protects wild elephants?Nice little bit of hyperbole there. Hunting is not poaching. Hunting raises fees that are used to STOP poaching and to better manage the herd.
You are wrong, period. Where hunting is legal, elephants are in large numbers. Where hunting is banned, poaching has reduced the elephant numbers drastically.
To: Lurker
Yes, people do eat elephants. And as Ted Nugent says, "You can't grill it, until you kill it."
98
posted on
06/08/2007 11:43:57 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
(The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
To: Beckwith
The bow does not appear to have been extensively used in later times in either the Greek or Roman armies. You might want to look into the history of the ballista.
L
99
posted on
06/08/2007 11:51:52 AM PDT
by
Lurker
(Comparing moderate islam to extremist islam is like comparing small pox to plague.)
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
.that must have been one hell of a good shot. When you're firing into a herd, you're gonna hit something.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 241-257 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson