Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Goodbye wires... MIT experimentally demonstrates wireless power transfer
physorg.com ^ | 6/7/07

Posted on 06/08/2007 3:31:16 AM PDT by Straight Vermonter

Imagine a future in which wireless power transfer is feasible: cell phones, household robots, mp3 players, laptop computers and other portable electronics capable of charging themselves without ever being plugged in, freeing us from that final, ubiquitous power wire. Some of these devices might not even need their bulky batteries to operate.

A team from MIT’s Department of Physics, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, and Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies (ISN) has experimentally demonstrated an important step toward accomplishing this vision of the future. The team members are Andre Kurs, Aristeidis Karalis, Robert Moffatt, Prof. Peter Fisher, and Prof. John Joannopoulos (Francis Wright Davis Chair and director of ISN), led by Prof. Marin Soljacic. Realizing their recent theoretical prediction, they were able to light a 60W light bulb from a power source seven feet (more than two meters) away; there was no physical connection between the source and the appliance. The MIT team refers to its concept as “WiTricity” (as in wireless electricity). The work will be reported in the June 7 issue of Science Express, the advance online publication of the journal Science.

The story starts one late night a few years ago, with Soljacic (pronounced Soul-ya-cheech) standing in his pajamas, staring at his cell phone on the kitchen counter. “It was probably the sixth time that month that I was awakened by my cell phone beeping to let me know that I had forgotten to charge it. It occurred to me that it would be so great if the thing took care of its own charging.” To make this possible, one would have to have a way to transmit power wirelessly, so Soljacic started thinking about which physical phenomena could help make this wish a reality.

Various methods of transmitting power wirelessly have been known for centuries. Perhaps the best known example is electromagnetic radiation, such as radio waves. While such radiation is excellent for wireless transmission of information, it is not feasible to use it for power transmission. Since radiation spreads in all directions, a vast majority of power would end up being wasted into free space. One can envision using directed electromagnetic radiation, such as lasers, but this is not very practical and can even be dangerous. It requires an uninterrupted line of sight between the source and the device, as well as a sophisticated tracking mechanism when the device is mobile.

In contrast, WiTricity is based on using coupled resonant objects. Two resonant objects of the same resonant frequency tend to exchange energy efficiently, while interacting weakly with extraneous off-resonant objects. A child on a swing is a good example of this. A swing is a type of mechanical resonance, so only when the child pumps her legs at the natural frequency of the swing is she able to impart substantial energy. Another example involves acoustic resonances: Imagine a room with 100 identical wine glasses, each filled with wine up to a different level, so they all have different resonant frequencies. If an opera singer sings a sufficiently loud single note inside the room, a glass of the corresponding frequency might accumulate sufficient energy to even explode, while not influencing the other glasses. In any system of coupled resonators there often exists a so-called “strongly coupled” regime of operation. If one ensures to operate in that regime in a given system, the energy transfer can be very efficient.

While these considerations are universal, applying to all kinds of resonances (e.g., acoustic, mechanical, electromagnetic, etc.), the MIT team focused on one particular type: magnetically coupled resonators. The team explored a system of two electromagnetic resonators coupled mostly through their magnetic fields; they were able to identify the strongly coupled regime in this system, even when the distance between them was several times larger than the sizes of the resonant objects. This way, efficient power transfer was enabled. Magnetic coupling is particularly suitable for everyday applications because most common materials interact only very weakly with magnetic fields, so interactions with extraneous environmental objects are suppressed even further. “The fact that magnetic fields interact so weakly with biological organisms is also important for safety considerations,” Kurs, a graduate student in physics, points out.

The investigated design consists of two copper coils, each a self-resonant system. One of the coils, attached to the power source, is the sending unit. Instead of irradiating the environment with electromagnetic waves, it fills the space around it with a non-radiative magnetic field oscillating at MHz frequencies. The non-radiative field mediates the power exchange with the other coil (the receiving unit), which is specially designed to resonate with the field. The resonant nature of the process ensures the strong interaction between the sending unit and the receiving unit, while the interaction with the rest of the environment is weak. Moffatt, an MIT undergraduate in physics, explains: “The crucial advantage of using the non-radiative field lies in the fact that most of the power not picked up by the receiving coil remains bound to the vicinity of the sending unit, instead of being radiated into the environment and lost.” With such a design, power transfer has a limited range, and the range would be shorter for smaller-size receivers. Still, for laptop-sized coils, power levels more than sufficient to run a laptop can be transferred over room-sized distances nearly omni-directionally and efficiently, irrespective of the geometry of the surrounding space, even when environmental objects completely obstruct the line-of-sight between the two coils. Fisher points out: “As long as the laptop is in a room equipped with a source of such wireless power, it would charge automatically, without having to be plugged in. In fact, it would not even need a battery to operate inside of such a room.” In the long run, this could reduce our society’s dependence on batteries, which are currently heavy and expensive.

At first glance, such a power transfer is reminiscent of relatively commonplace magnetic induction, such as is used in power transformers, which contain coils that transmit power to each other over very short distances. An electric current running in a sending coil induces another current in a receiving coil. The two coils are very close, but they do not touch. However, this behavior changes dramatically when the distance between the coils is increased. As Karalis, a graduate student in electrical engineering and computer science, points out, “Here is where the magic of the resonant coupling comes about. The usual non-resonant magnetic induction would be almost 1 million times less efficient in this particular system.”

WiTricity is rooted in such well-known laws of physics that it makes one wonder why no one thought of it before. “In the past, there was no great demand for such a system, so people did not have a strong motivation to look into it,” points out Joannopoulos, adding, “Over the past several years, portable electronic devices, such as laptops, cell phones, iPods and even household robots have become widespread, all of which require batteries that need to be recharged often.”

As for what the future holds, Soljacic adds, “Once, when my son was about three years old, we visited his grandparents’ house. They had a 20-year-old phone and my son picked up the handset, asking, ‘Dad, why is this phone attached with a cord to the wall"’ That is the mindset of a child growing up in a wireless world. My best response was, ‘It is strange and awkward, isn’t it" Hopefully, we will be getting rid of some more wires, and also batteries, soon.’”

Source: Massachusetts Institute of Technology


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: energy; nicolatesla; tesla; wardenclyffe; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last
To: Straight Vermonter

Look. All radio and TV transmitters transmit electrical energy. A radio or TV receiver’s antenna receives a small amount of that power. The radio or TV selects a specific frequency and amplifies the power to produce an audible signal.
The principle of transmitting power through the air is not new, not far out. It is valid.
Problems:
The power received drops as the cube of the distance from the transmitter.
It is an inefficient method of sending power from one place to another.
If the transmitter power is increased, anyone who gets in the way of the signal will be roasted. This is nothing new. If you climb up a TV transmitter tower you may be roasted.

Here’s a practical application that can be used now:
Set up a receiver near a radio or TV tower and steal some of the power that is transmitted. There will be no detriment to the signal received by everyone else and you will get free power. But don’t get close or you will get roasted.


41 posted on 06/08/2007 4:33:12 AM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

....doesn’t sound too healthy to me. Not sure I want to be constantly be zapped with enough voltage to light a light bulb.


42 posted on 06/08/2007 4:43:31 AM PDT by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

It’s kind of a pathetic commentary on the state of engineering education at MIT (and the US in general)when they trumpet a high school science fair project as a major advance in technology. Telsa’s experiments in the 30’s proof just how ridiculous this story is as well as illustrating the gullibility of and lack of basic scientific knowledge in the MSM.


43 posted on 06/08/2007 4:44:37 AM PDT by NHResident
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

There’s already a commercial venture doing this. I believe they were at CES earlier ths year: http://www.ecoupled.com/


44 posted on 06/08/2007 4:51:29 AM PDT by craig_eddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk

“Socialized Power” (?)


45 posted on 06/08/2007 4:51:31 AM PDT by RangerM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
About as economically feasible as ethanol. Where is my $5.00 bag of corn chips anyway?
46 posted on 06/08/2007 4:53:58 AM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RangerM

It would be just that I suppose, realistically it would probably evolve into different transmitted frquencies of power strength, the military might use a restricted band while consumers would need to buy a time alotment much like Tracphones I guess, free would be for the Perfect Planet like in another solar sytem or if we colonize Mars, here on Earth it would be impossible what with Islamics saying its evil and then you have the Druids saying its evil, and those losing money like OPEC saying its evil.


47 posted on 06/08/2007 5:12:27 AM PDT by Eye of Unk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

That’s great so my neighboors can hack in to my “grid” and steal power from me... :)


48 posted on 06/08/2007 5:19:39 AM PDT by Syntyr (Freepers - In the top %5 of informed Americans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk
...this could possibly end all these fruitless wars over oil control.

They're only fruitless because we haven't played to win yet.

49 posted on 06/08/2007 5:35:52 AM PDT by hunter112 (Change will happen when very good men are forced to do very bad things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

“Thanks. This is just a variation of Tesla’s design.”

Yep, but not one mention of him in the article.

Sad, when people think “electricity” they think “Edison”. Even in death Tesla keeps getting royally screwed.


50 posted on 06/08/2007 5:42:44 AM PDT by L98Fiero (A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

I don’t suppose the 55% wasted energy would end up heating the air would it?


51 posted on 06/08/2007 5:55:10 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
What is the efficiency of transfer and aren’t the waves of energy created by the sending coil that are not being used simply being wasted?

Most likely dissipated as heat.....

52 posted on 06/08/2007 6:11:38 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (Just the facts ma'am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

I wonder if Prof. Marin Soljacic is a Serb? The name could be Serbian. Tesla was a Serb (or Serbian-American, as Wiki says).


53 posted on 06/08/2007 6:15:45 AM PDT by -YYZ- ("My Rocinante" sailed by night on her final flight...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter; All

Anyone here know if this resonance technology could be tuned to use the Earth’s magnetic field as a power source?


54 posted on 06/08/2007 6:18:34 AM PDT by Reaganesque (Romney 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

How many thousands of homes are burned each year because of electrical short circuits? Elliminating the need for hot wires running to and fro inside your walls would be a great thing.


55 posted on 06/08/2007 6:20:03 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RangerM
I’ve read about this a few years ago, and from what I understand, the amount of energy you have to put into the trasmission is massive, relative to the amount of useful work/energy that is realized.

How does it compare to charging and expending NiCad batteries?

56 posted on 06/08/2007 6:25:32 AM PDT by Oberon (What does it take to make government shrink?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

There is a big problem with the photo of the experimenters. No “diversity”!!.


57 posted on 06/08/2007 6:32:19 AM PDT by Drawsing (The fool shows his annoyance at once. The prudent man overlooks an insult. (Proverbs 12:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
Why is it that every time a scientific discovery is reported on FR - we have dozens of nay sayers telling us that it is:

a fraud
a stupid idea
A dozen reasons why it won't work
or "this is nothing new."

Is this a forum for Luddites?

I for one, am glad to hear about these stories - technology will continue to make our lives better and better - no matter what these anti-science folks say.

58 posted on 06/08/2007 6:32:32 AM PDT by Tokra (I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind
Just wait until someone figures out that this will cause cancer...

Just think, if elecricity had just been discovered today, it would have been deemed too dangerous and we would still be sitting in the dark.

59 posted on 06/08/2007 6:38:30 AM PDT by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

They aren’t really inducing waves of energy. They coil is built to not radiate energy, but to feed it back. They are inducing a high-frequency magnetic field, which the other coil picks up and re-radiates back. I don’t understand the physics (I haven’t read the details), but I think you can picture this like dropping a pebble in the water, and then having another point where the water can reflect back at exactly the right distance to add. After a little while, the waves in most directions remain almost invisible, but in the ONE direction where there is echo, the waves are quite large.

The paper suggests 45% efficiency, which actually is pretty good compared to the efficiency of a battery charger system (not great, but good).

It’s likely there is less energy used when there is no feedback, just like a transformer uses a lot less electricity when it’s secondary coil is not connected to anything. At MHZ frequencies, the current should be very low because the inductance would be high absent the feedback.

And 50% efficiency in exchange for never having to plug in chargers, and getting rid of batteries, might be a very good thing.

I don’t know, in some ways it seems like an idea looking for a problem to solve. Pretty cool though.


60 posted on 06/08/2007 6:53:50 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson