Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FOX reporting Immigration Bill on Death Bed
Fox News | 6/7/07 | Freespirited

Posted on 06/07/2007 5:42:31 PM PDT by freespirited

Major Garrett has sources on both sides of the aisle telling him we can write the bill's obituary. Roll call going on now.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; bushkennedy; illegals; immigrantlist; immigration; scamnesty; shamnesty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 361-371 next last
To: Sir Francis Dashwood
>Dual citizenship should be prohibited.<



"In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American...

There can be NO divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but ONE flag, the American flag... We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language...

and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people." Theodore Roosevelt 1907


 

ATFOTRAF

281 posted on 06/07/2007 8:22:56 PM PDT by B4Ranch (Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

The coming primaries are going to be a lot of fun to watch...


282 posted on 06/07/2007 8:26:39 PM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

thanks Dennis...good to be here


283 posted on 06/07/2007 8:27:09 PM PDT by wardaddy (on parole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
We need McConnel and Boehner making an announcement like the Dems did when they killed the Patriot Act.

Something to the effect of, “Ladies and gentlemen, we have just killed the amnesty bill!”

284 posted on 06/07/2007 8:27:32 PM PDT by RatsDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17
Feinstein just said that this bill could be passed “in part.” I think she just slipped up by stating how they will next try to enact Amnesty.

The powers that be in both parties want this to happen. They haven't given up on amnesty in some form.

285 posted on 06/07/2007 8:37:17 PM PDT by Minipax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: okie01

I’ve seen a number of posts giving a Kyl a pass or pardon as you put it but you’d better be careful with this clown because once somebody does or tries something this effing stupid they’ll do or try it again on something else. Be watchful. Vigilant even.


286 posted on 06/07/2007 9:48:56 PM PDT by jwh_Denver (Press 1 for English. Not me, I press 2 and say I can't speak Spanish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

How about a recall on Salazar!


287 posted on 06/07/2007 9:50:33 PM PDT by jwh_Denver (Press 1 for English. Not me, I press 2 and say I can't speak Spanish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

I did, and I do. Technically, they were traitors. Honorable intentions, but traitors just the same.


288 posted on 06/08/2007 5:56:57 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s
Funny, the "right to life" people say EXACTLY the same thing about the life issue; the WoT people say EXACTLY the same thing about that issue; the "courts" people say EXACTLY the same thing about that issue. "It's the priority, it's the ONLY issue that's important."

And, yes, every statistic we have shows that the Reagan tax cuts were not only NOT "temporary," but that the 1990s were almost entirely based on those cuts.

289 posted on 06/08/2007 5:58:49 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
I understand---but that doesn't make him any less wrong about what the Constitution said about his duties. I could say the same about Bush, that he's following "his heart" about allowing in illegals.

There is no way around the fact that ANY confederate was a traitor. Most well-meaning, and sincerely believing they had the "right" interpretation of the Constitution . . . but so did the Federalists in 1814 who planned secession. So do those idiots in Vermont right now talking secession. It's a traitorous activity, and people want to give Lee a pass because he was a nice guy.

290 posted on 06/08/2007 6:00:35 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17
Well stated. I think someone like Voinovich falls into that category, while someone like Kyl absolutely does not.

I'm amused at all the Freepers who bash Rudy all the time over his "pro-choice" views, but here we have a couple of senators, Kyl and McConnell, who are 100% pro-life and yet "off with their heads" over this particular issue.

If you review Freeper comments about whatever is "hot" at the time---judges, pro-life, gay marriage, the war, immigration---you will find that "ONLY" that issue matters. No, we cannot consider anything else, because if we "don't get this right, it's all meaningless."

291 posted on 06/08/2007 6:05:41 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Don’t bet on it. All this vote really meant is that debate is not yet closed and it can’t come to a vote.
Sooner or later it, or its evil will make to the floor to be voted upon.


292 posted on 06/08/2007 6:11:25 AM PDT by Little Ray (Rudy Guiliani: If his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

Don’t bet on it. All this vote really meant is that debate is not yet closed and it can’t come to a vote.
Sooner or later it, or its evil will make to the floor to be voted upon.


293 posted on 06/08/2007 6:11:31 AM PDT by Little Ray (Rudy Guiliani: If his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS
I was referring to the Bush tax cuts, not Reagan’s.

Yes, most one issue people do feel that theirs is the only issue.

Illegals is most certainly not the only issue. Not with me anyway. *But* my contention still stands. If we don’t control our southern border, our other concerns will become unattainable. As far as priorities are concerned, where is it written that only one issue at a time can be dealt with? You and I don’t run our personal and professional lives one issue at a time. Surely the leadership of the US government ought to be able to multitask. Even as dumb as they are. But if they can’t focus on more than one thing at a time (which often seems to be the case) then stopping illegals needs to be first in line.

Also, securing the southern border is not a separate issue from WOT. It is an integral part of the WOT.

Taxes and spending? What success do you suppose we will have there with another 30 million [bottom rung] illegals?

As unhappy as many of us are with the Republican party, how are we going to advance our agenda on any issue after 12 million mexicans start voting Democrat and the Republicans are relegated to permanent doormats?

None of these problems exists in isolation. But we have to decide how we are going to address them and how to allocate our resources.

294 posted on 06/08/2007 7:03:25 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

I agree, but I list “WoT” as the #1 issue, and if they are divided, the border is #2. While terrorists can come across both our borders, so far MOST terrorists are “over there.” So if I had to separate them, I’d put WoT #1, judges #2 (because almost everything CAN be accomplished-—the wrong way, but accomplished-—through the courts), border #3, and life #4, because I think you have to take care of those already here first, or there won’t be any unborn to worry about.


295 posted on 06/08/2007 9:45:13 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: LS; stainlessbanner
I did, and I do. Technically, they were traitors. Honorable intentions, but traitors just the same.

That you cling to that says plenty about your intentions with your otherwise reasonable history book.

Glad to see we've shaken that out.

296 posted on 06/08/2007 9:49:06 AM PDT by wardaddy (on parole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: LS
because I think you have to take care of those already here first, or there won’t be any unborn to worry about.

I will go along with that. Also, what I try to convince the single issue pro lifers is that abortion is an issue we will have to win over a period of time. Incrementalism is the only way. And we will win by first winning over the hearts of the people and at the same time nudging the courts in the right direction. I believe the people's view of abortion has changed a lot in recent years, progress is being made. The scales are tipping. As evidenced by the abject hysteria on the left when the subject is broached.

But the border & terrorism are not nearly so incremental. We can't whittle away at them. We need to be decisive, resolute and not go wobbly when things are not going well.

Judges are essential also, but that is a long term project which requires long term dominance by conservative thinking pols. Like terror, it will never be won without continual, never ending vigilance.

297 posted on 06/08/2007 11:01:14 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

Glad to explain things to my slower readers.


298 posted on 06/08/2007 11:45:55 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

Disagree on the judges. We are one away. This could come as soon as next year, and for all the Bush bashing here, he has been excellent on judges, and could possibly give us the 5/4 majority with a frequent 6/3 majority if Kennedy decides to play it straight. This could start affecting things within a year. Put another way, through their rulings they could have an impact before any fence would.


299 posted on 06/08/2007 11:47:39 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: LS; stainlessbanner
Glad to explain things to my slower readers

you really mean chumps that bought your alleged conservative history book that only just pretends selectively to be such?

yes...I stand guilty of that...but don't worry it won't happen again.

and btw....it's no surprise to many here that folks like you who equivocate over amnesty as if it's just another run of the mill policy mistake that should not blemish the records of otherwise fine senators also happen to be disproportionately South demonizers as well.

Equivocators are the bane of conservatism and are the main reason we are not dealing with illegals properly because they see it as an ethnic issue and given their obession with redress, they can't deal with brown illegals

300 posted on 06/08/2007 12:31:48 PM PDT by wardaddy (on parole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 361-371 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson