Skip to comments.
Bill may add taxes on imports
Home Textiles Today ^
| 06/07/2007
Posted on 06/07/2007 3:16:22 PM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: pissant; Paperdoll; Calpernia; calex59; Jeff Head; 1rudeboy; Toddsterpatriot; AuntB; Kevmo; ...
2
posted on
06/07/2007 3:17:24 PM PDT
by
Ultra Sonic 007
(Why vote for Duncan Hunter in 2008? Look at my profile.)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
3
posted on
06/07/2007 3:18:01 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Perhaps we could cut the corporate income tax. At 39% we have the 2nd highest in the world.
4
posted on
06/07/2007 3:18:28 PM PDT
by
Barney Gumble
(A liberal is someone too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel - Robert Frost)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Smoot-Hawley....Hoot Smally???
5
posted on
06/07/2007 3:30:44 PM PDT
by
Don Corleone
(Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Put the vice to the negotiators balls.
6
posted on
06/07/2007 3:36:29 PM PDT
by
pissant
To: Barney Gumble
I don’t know about the others but Duncan Hunter wants to get rid of the tax on manufacturing all together. As I understand it, it’s the tax on all parts in process or in stock.
7
posted on
06/07/2007 3:41:33 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
To: Don Corleone
Yes,
Smoot-Hawley redux. One step closer to the next
Great Depression. The tax increases coming in 2010 (if the Traitor Party wins) will push us over the cliff.
8
posted on
06/07/2007 3:44:01 PM PDT
by
AZLiberty
(President Fred -- I like the sound of it.)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Duncan Hunter is good for real American businesses—those who are actually willing to work and build products. We’ve had enough of the lazies, who preside over work that doesn’t happen here and enrich antagonistic foreign competition against our nation.
9
posted on
06/07/2007 3:44:59 PM PDT
by
familyop
To: Barney Gumble
That is one of many rates. 1 in 6 of the 250 corporations paid NO tax from 1996-1998. Those dates come from a study done by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.
10
posted on
06/07/2007 3:50:02 PM PDT
by
TxCopper
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Has Duncan Hunter signed on to HR 25 (The Fair Tax)? Also, this has shades of something I read in a Tom Clancy novel once. I believe it was called the Trade Reform Act. In the book, it allowed our country to mirror the tariffs and inspections practices of the country with whom we were trading. It also allowed the government to apply the law selectively. I think such a law would be nice...:)
To: stefanbatory; pissant; SittinYonder; WalterSkinner
Yep. Hunter's a cosponsor of the FairTax act.
Here he is at a recent FairTax Rally.
12
posted on
06/07/2007 4:18:23 PM PDT
by
Ultra Sonic 007
(Why vote for Duncan Hunter in 2008? Look at my profile.)
To: Ultra Sonic 007
Taxes on imports I would think already are covered in the Constitution under tariff’s. Can’t you just use existing laws?
13
posted on
06/07/2007 4:26:01 PM PDT
by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: edcoil; Calpernia; Kevmo; AuntB; pissant; Paperdoll
I think it has to do with existing trade laws that forbid us from doing the same thing to countries under the agreement.
They can slap tariffs on us, but under the current trade agreements, we can’t do the same...nor can we rebate taxes like they can for their own exporters, or we become penalized.
It’s stupid, I know.
14
posted on
06/07/2007 4:31:24 PM PDT
by
Ultra Sonic 007
(Why vote for Duncan Hunter in 2008? Look at my profile.)
To: TxCopper; Barney Gumble; Mase; 1rudeboy
That is one of many rates.What are the other rates?
1 in 6 of the 250 corporations paid NO tax from 1996-1998.
So what is your point? High rates are okay because a corporation with no income paid no taxes? LOL!
Those dates come from a study done by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.
ITEP is governed by a group of leaders from academia, labor, and the policy community (affiliations used only for identification purposes):
President: Richard Pomp University of Connecticut Law School Vice-President: Robert Kuttner The American Prospect Howard Chernick Hunter College Henry Coleman Rutgers University Iris Lav Center on Budget and Policy Priorities Marie Monrad Robert Reich Brandeis University Jean Ross California Budget Project Dianne Stewart Center for Public Policy Priorities Dean Tipps Service Employees International Union No studies from EPI or CPUSA available? |
15
posted on
06/07/2007 4:32:48 PM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so dumb?)
To: AZLiberty
Another globalist heard from.
16
posted on
06/07/2007 4:39:22 PM PDT
by
Paperdoll
( Duncan Hunter '08)
To: Toddsterpatriot
CPUSA probably advised signing those agreements. What more do you need, Toddler?
17
posted on
06/07/2007 4:44:01 PM PDT
by
Paperdoll
( Duncan Hunter '08)
To: Toddsterpatriot
Corporate income tax rates for 2007 range from 15% - 39%. The rates are a little screwy because it is a progressive tax based on taxable income, but when the amount goes from 335,000 to 10,000,000 the rate actually falls to 34, then at 10,000,000 to 15,000,000 it climbs to 35%. At 15,000,000 to 18,333,333 it is taxed at 38% and then it falls again back to 35%.
I didn't say that high rates were ok. They are not. If rates were lower, we would have more receipts. I just made the point that 1 in 6 of the 250 largest corporations paid no federal income tax during those years.
18
posted on
06/07/2007 4:47:36 PM PDT
by
TxCopper
To: TxCopper
I didn't say that high rates were ok. They are not. If rates were lower, we would have more receipts. And more corporations.
I just made the point that 1 in 6 of the 250 largest corporations paid no federal income tax during those years.
Your original claim didn't say 250 largest.
19
posted on
06/07/2007 4:53:35 PM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so dumb?)
To: Paperdoll
CPUSA probably advised signing those agreements.I think they were on the same page as you.
What more do you need, Toddler?
How about some facts, sweetie?
20
posted on
06/07/2007 4:54:56 PM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so dumb?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson