Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill may add taxes on imports
Home Textiles Today ^ | 06/07/2007

Posted on 06/07/2007 3:16:22 PM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007

Washington -- A bipartisan quartet of Congressmen today introduced legislation that would levy a border tax on imported goods unless the U.S. Trade Representative negotiates with other countries to end their border taxes on U.S. exports as well as tax rebates to their own manufacturers.

The Border Tax Equity Act was sponsored by Rep. Bill Pascrell (D-NJ), Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA), Rep. Mike Michaud (D-ME) and Rep. Walter Jones (R-NC). The sponsors argue U.S. producers and services providers face a $379 billion trade disadvantage due to foreign border-adjusted taxes on U.S. goods, as well as value-added taxes (VAT).

Further, proponents of the bill note that while World Trade Organization rules do not allow the United States to rebate the corporate taxes its exporters pay, the majority of U.S. trading partners still do so under an exemption in the WTO rules. Under the proposed legislation, if the US Trade Representative fails to negotiate a remedy by an as-yet unspecified date, the federal government will issue rebates to U.S. exporters equal to the amount of taxes they've paid on their goods to an importing nation. It will also levy new taxes on goods being imported into the United States.

"I strongly support fair trade, but it needs to be on a level playing field," said Jones. "Differential treatment of direct and indirect taxes under international trade rules puts U.S. producers at a profound disadvantage."

The action is being supported by the American Manufacturing Trade Action Coalition, the AFL-CIO and the United States Business and Industry Council.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: business; duncanhunter; economy; trade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

1 posted on 06/07/2007 3:16:24 PM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pissant; Paperdoll; Calpernia; calex59; Jeff Head; 1rudeboy; Toddsterpatriot; AuntB; Kevmo; ...

Ping of interest.


2 posted on 06/07/2007 3:17:24 PM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007 (Why vote for Duncan Hunter in 2008? Look at my profile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

It’s a start.


3 posted on 06/07/2007 3:18:01 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

Perhaps we could cut the corporate income tax. At 39% we have the 2nd highest in the world.


4 posted on 06/07/2007 3:18:28 PM PDT by Barney Gumble (A liberal is someone too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel - Robert Frost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

Smoot-Hawley....Hoot Smally???


5 posted on 06/07/2007 3:30:44 PM PDT by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

Put the vice to the negotiators balls.


6 posted on 06/07/2007 3:36:29 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Barney Gumble

I don’t know about the others but Duncan Hunter wants to get rid of the tax on manufacturing all together. As I understand it, it’s the tax on all parts in process or in stock.


7 posted on 06/07/2007 3:41:33 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
Yes, Smoot-Hawley redux. One step closer to the next Great Depression. The tax increases coming in 2010 (if the Traitor Party wins) will push us over the cliff.
8 posted on 06/07/2007 3:44:01 PM PDT by AZLiberty (President Fred -- I like the sound of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

Duncan Hunter is good for real American businesses—those who are actually willing to work and build products. We’ve had enough of the lazies, who preside over work that doesn’t happen here and enrich antagonistic foreign competition against our nation.


9 posted on 06/07/2007 3:44:59 PM PDT by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Barney Gumble

That is one of many rates. 1 in 6 of the 250 corporations paid NO tax from 1996-1998. Those dates come from a study done by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.


10 posted on 06/07/2007 3:50:02 PM PDT by TxCopper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

Has Duncan Hunter signed on to HR 25 (The Fair Tax)? Also, this has shades of something I read in a Tom Clancy novel once. I believe it was called the Trade Reform Act. In the book, it allowed our country to mirror the tariffs and inspections practices of the country with whom we were trading. It also allowed the government to apply the law selectively. I think such a law would be nice...:)


11 posted on 06/07/2007 4:08:49 PM PDT by stefanbatory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stefanbatory; pissant; SittinYonder; WalterSkinner
Yep. Hunter's a cosponsor of the FairTax act.

Here he is at a recent FairTax Rally.

12 posted on 06/07/2007 4:18:23 PM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007 (Why vote for Duncan Hunter in 2008? Look at my profile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007
Taxes on imports I would think already are covered in the Constitution under tariff’s. Can’t you just use existing laws?
13 posted on 06/07/2007 4:26:01 PM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil; Calpernia; Kevmo; AuntB; pissant; Paperdoll

I think it has to do with existing trade laws that forbid us from doing the same thing to countries under the agreement.

They can slap tariffs on us, but under the current trade agreements, we can’t do the same...nor can we rebate taxes like they can for their own exporters, or we become penalized.

It’s stupid, I know.


14 posted on 06/07/2007 4:31:24 PM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007 (Why vote for Duncan Hunter in 2008? Look at my profile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TxCopper; Barney Gumble; Mase; 1rudeboy
That is one of many rates.

What are the other rates?

1 in 6 of the 250 corporations paid NO tax from 1996-1998.

So what is your point? High rates are okay because a corporation with no income paid no taxes? LOL!

Those dates come from a study done by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.

ITEP Board of Directors


ITEP is governed by a group of leaders from academia, labor, and the policy community (affiliations used only for identification purposes):

President: Richard Pomp
University of Connecticut Law School

Vice-President: Robert Kuttner
The American Prospect

Howard Chernick
Hunter College

Henry Coleman
Rutgers University

Iris Lav
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

Marie Monrad

Robert Reich
Brandeis University

Jean Ross
California Budget Project

Dianne Stewart
Center for Public Policy Priorities

Dean Tipps
Service Employees International Union

No studies from EPI or CPUSA available?


15 posted on 06/07/2007 4:32:48 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so dumb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AZLiberty

Another globalist heard from.


16 posted on 06/07/2007 4:39:22 PM PDT by Paperdoll ( Duncan Hunter '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

CPUSA probably advised signing those agreements. What more do you need, Toddler?


17 posted on 06/07/2007 4:44:01 PM PDT by Paperdoll ( Duncan Hunter '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Corporate income tax rates for 2007 range from 15% - 39%. The rates are a little screwy because it is a progressive tax based on taxable income, but when the amount goes from 335,000 to 10,000,000 the rate actually falls to 34, then at 10,000,000 to 15,000,000 it climbs to 35%. At 15,000,000 to 18,333,333 it is taxed at 38% and then it falls again back to 35%.

I didn't say that high rates were ok. They are not. If rates were lower, we would have more receipts. I just made the point that 1 in 6 of the 250 largest corporations paid no federal income tax during those years.
18 posted on 06/07/2007 4:47:36 PM PDT by TxCopper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TxCopper
I didn't say that high rates were ok. They are not. If rates were lower, we would have more receipts.

And more corporations.

I just made the point that 1 in 6 of the 250 largest corporations paid no federal income tax during those years.

Your original claim didn't say 250 largest.

19 posted on 06/07/2007 4:53:35 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so dumb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll
CPUSA probably advised signing those agreements.

I think they were on the same page as you.

What more do you need, Toddler?

How about some facts, sweetie?

20 posted on 06/07/2007 4:54:56 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists (and goldbugs) so dumb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson