Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NormsRevenge
"I do think that we have suffered over the past several years for a number of reasons, and I think you probably know what they are,"

So what is the plan Mitt? Let Iran obtain nukes while we try to get international consensus? Sign up for whatever global warming treaty Europe thinks we should? It is easy to get everyone to like you, just do whatever they want you to.

34 posted on 06/07/2007 2:48:12 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Always Right
So what is the plan Mitt?

I don't really think you care what his plan is since you are a Fredhead, but since you misrepresented what his plan is I thought I'd clue you in.

Mitt has said that the military option is not off of the table. In addition to the last resort option, he's also proposed the following:

Summary of Five-Point Plan To Confront The Iran Threat

First, We Should Tighten Economic Sanctions. The Administration deserves recognition for restricting access to banking and credit services. Other nations must act now to follow our lead. In addition, Governor Romney has called for strategic divestment from companies that support the Iranian regime's dangerous actions. As the world's financial center, no state could have a bigger impact than New York. After a new state Comptroller was named for New York, Governor Romney wrote the Comptroller, Governor Spitzer and Senators Schumer and Clinton urging them to join in the effort to stop New York pension funds from aiding Iran's efforts.

Second, We Should Isolate Iran Diplomatically. Their leaders should be made to feel like those of Apartheid South Africa. Until there are indications that high level engagement would do anything other than reward bad behavior, the United States should not engage Iran in direct, bilateral negotiations over their nuclear weapons program. Finally, Iran's President Ahmadinejad should be indicted under the terms of the Genocide Convention for incitement to genocide.

Third, Arab States Must Join This Effort To Prevent A Nuclear Iran. These states should support Iraq's government; turn down the temperature of the Arab-Israeli conflict; stop the financial and weapons flows to Hamas and Hezbollah; and tell the Palestinians to drop their terror campaign and recognize Israel's right to exist.

Fourth, We Must Make It Clear To The Iranian People That While Nuclear Capabilities May Be A Source Of Pride, It Can Also Be A Source Of Peril. If nuclear material from their nation falls into the hands of terrorists and is used, it would provoke a devastating response from the civilized world. The military option remains on the table.

Fifth, Our Strategy Must Be Integrated Into A Broader Approach To The Muslim World. We must work with moderate Muslim communities and leaders to build a lasting Partnership for Prosperity and Progress.

_________________________________

Also, Mitt knows we did not invade unitalerally, but the WH allowed a false perception to grow and fester when the truth was that nearly 50 countries assisted our war effort and over a dozen sent troops.

We can and should do a better job of rebutting false liberal talking points and presenting ourselves in the best possible light whenever possible. It can't hurt.

Mitt's Plan for Iran and WOT here.

36 posted on 06/07/2007 4:51:33 PM PDT by redgirlinabluestate (MittReport.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Always Right
Also, while I haven't heard any specifics from Fred like Romney has provided, it sounds like your friend, Fred, is also talking about international consensus and "bonding" here when talking to Hannity the other night while the other candidates debated:

HANNITY: Explain what you mean, “the battle between forces of civilization and evil.” What do you mean by that?

THOMPSON: Well, it has to do with the need for all of the civilized countries, as I would call them — that is, most all of them that are not terrorist countries or terrorist havens — to realize we have to come together. I mean, that's one of the big failures that we have right now, because a lot of people in other parts of the world just don't see it yet. They see us as the number-one threat and really, in some cases, the only threat. We're going to have to bond together and face this thing together against these forces, because it's going to pick us off one by one.

We've seen our country attacked time and time again over the last decades. Now you see it, whether it's Madrid, whether it's London, whether it's places that most people have never heard of, they're methodically going around trying to undermine our allies and attack people in conventional ways. Meanwhile they try to develop non-conventional ways, and get their hands on a nuclear capability, and ultimately to see a mushroom cloud over an American city. No country can do that alone, and by themselves, when you face the global threat that we're facing.
www.foxnews.com

I think Mitt and Fred agree that we can be strong without being stupid.

37 posted on 06/07/2007 4:59:38 PM PDT by redgirlinabluestate (MittReport.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson