Many of the candidates have had flip flops in their positions. What you describe is what politicians do, Bush included. He completely scammed Christian conservatives.
This election I am taking a different tactic. I am looking more at the character of the candidates: who they are and what they have achieved. That seems a better predictor. Time will tell.
I am not voting for any establishment, CFR globalist types. They are worse than liberals. They are traitors.
I can understand that.
This election I am taking a different tactic. I am looking more at the character of the candidates: who they are and what they have achieved. That seems a better predictor.
And that's fine. But if he was once "pro-choice" on abortion, then that shows a track record of a character flaw. After all, if you can't defend the least of these, how are you going to treat any other oppressed group?
As for a contemporary eval of his character, I would say that the degree to which a person is vulnerable to deception in what he/she would deem the most important area of his/her life--THAT is a character flaw. (How is someone who can't even define historic Christianity going to instill confidence about defining other world religions like Islam?)
As for what he's achieved, he'd probably tell you whatever it is, it's nothing compared to what he wants to accomplish in the future: First in the White House, then in his own world as a god (since LDS define "exaltation" and the accompanying "exaltation" as having your own world as a god, making spirit babies with mom-god).
Now just think about the Democrats & Democratic journalists, waiting back, who will bring this issue up day after day if Mitt wins the primaries: "Mitt Romney, the only potential future god, is making a run for an office that won't compare to his celestial throne to come at a later point in his 'career'..."