Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexanSniper

No, I think it’s as much full of crap as your post. “Pro-life” has never meant being satisfied with states permitting abortion, and pro-choice has never meant being in favor of state prohibitions of abortion. #24 is the most tortured abuse of language I have ever read on Free Republic, and your post is an outright falsehood.

If you don’t supply any statement of Fred’s to back up your assertion that Fred just came out “pro-choice,” I will have to conclude you are a liar.


52 posted on 06/06/2007 9:16:06 AM PDT by dangus (Mr. President, "Choke on it b!+ch" is not a very good campaign slogan for your amnesty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: dangus

Okay Dangus, What are your definitions of Pro-Life and Pro-Choice?


66 posted on 06/06/2007 9:35:21 AM PDT by jonathanmo (No tag available at this time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: dangus; Politicalmom; HerrBlucher; Mensius; Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus; LibLieSlayer; ...
Ok, here is what he said last night:

 

HANNITY: Yes, let me ask you this. There are three issues that have come up, because I've examined your record thoroughly now, knowing this interview is coming up. There are three issues come up where people question your conservatism.

One is when you checked a box in 1994 when you were running for Senate, where you — the box said, "Abortion should be legal in all circumstances for the first three months." That wasn't your voting record, interestingly. Did you make a mistake checking the box?

THOMPSON: I don't remember that box. You know, it was a long time ago, and I don't know if I filled it out or my staff — based on what they thought my position was — filled it out.

But here's what the deal is on that. I've always thought that Roe v. Wade was a wrong decision, that they usurped what had been the law in this country for 200 years, that it was a matter that should go back to the states. When you get back to the states, I think the states should have some leeway.

I might vote against one approach, but I think the state ought to have it. And I would not be and never have been for a law that says, on the state level, if I were back in Tennessee voting on this, for example, that if they chose to criminalize a young woman, and...

HANNITY: So states' rights for you?

THOMPSON: Essentially, federalism. It's in the Constitution.

 

As I posted before, Hannity cut him off and he couldn't finish his thought so we will need clarification on what he meant. However, if you look at this video from the 90's you will notice that he said the exact same thing and completed by saying that abortion should not be criminalized.

When I posted that Thompson came out as pro choice I was expressing my own opinion based on what he said. My belief is that life begins at conception and that any form of abortion is nothing short of Murder. So this talk of allowing first trimester abortions and giving leeway may please some but it won't please me.  So make of this what you want and stop with the personal attacks.

88 posted on 06/06/2007 11:06:05 AM PDT by TexanSniper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson