We’re settling for less with this approach to education, and claiming a great victory.
VOUCHERS are the answer.
This is way too expensive an expansion of government power for the results. Government education sucks. Just because Bush’s signature is on it doesn’t make it any better.
How are higher test scores "settling for less"?
VOUCHERS are the answer.
But vouchers were defeated. So I guess we just shrug and say "Oh well"?
This is way too expensive an expansion of government power for the results. Government education sucks. Just because Bush’s signature is on it doesn’t make it any better.
The rhetorical excesses aside (who said anything about it being "netter" because it has Bush's signature?), how much is "way too expensive"? What is your yardstick for whether or not this is too much?