Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Catholic Bishop compares Giuliani to Pontius Pilate
Evangelicals for Mitt ^ | June 05, 2007 | Nancy French

Posted on 06/05/2007 2:50:36 PM PDT by TexanSniper

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: asparagus

“I’m sorry you have such distrust of LDS people. You can ask the people who lost their homes to Katrina what they think of the LDS people they met.”

My real problem isn’t with mormons per se, it is with mormonism. It is a cult, a false belief system that pretends to be Christianity when it is not. There is more to being than being “nice.” I’ve met many “nice” and “decent” folks from all different beliefs (hindus, buddists, atheists, etc.). However, they all - regardless of how “nice” or “charitable” they may be - are pushing systems that will result in the eternal destruction of souls. I’m certain that there are adherents to L. Ron Hubbard’s Scientology that do “good things.” However, most sensible persons would agree they are just plain looney to believe such nonsense that charatan put out (a not so good science fiction writer turned cult leader). I wouldn’t trust a scientologist to lead because they are intrinsically gullible. Joseph Smith, the founder of mormonism, was a 19th century huckster as was Brigham Young to followed him after Smith was strung up for forming his own private army and threatening the regular community - he was the David Koresh of his time. So, I don’t trust someone who buys into that nonsense. They are not fit to lead.


41 posted on 06/05/2007 7:47:00 PM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Revenge of Sith

“The Catholic Church doesn’t recognize Mormon baptism, but it does have a good relationship with the Mormon Church.”

I would certainly hope not in that mormon’s practice “proxy” baptism to “save” their dead ancestors. That is why geneology is so important to them. Of course, this isn’t too far away from the sale of indulgences to buy a relative out of purgatory - something the Roman church abandoned a very long time ago.


42 posted on 06/05/2007 7:50:36 PM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: asparagus

“Mitt has the vision, the ideas, and the organization to get the job done”

He could have used his executive power to try and stop homosexual marriage in Mass. What did he do.....nothing.


43 posted on 06/05/2007 7:54:28 PM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas
A rich man asked Jesus what he must do to gain eternal life. Jesus told him to go sell all that he had and give his riches to the poor and follow him. The rich man went away sorrowing, because of his many riches. When he got home, his Pharisee friends comforted him, saying, "You just avoided a dangerous cult!".

Many Freepers use this logic to deny Romney the White House. This logic is bigoted because they prejudge a person's intellect and capability based solely on their faith. We tell Iraqis to get beyond their religious differences, yet we have Freepers posting ignorant and bigoted statements about one of the largest churches in the country, simply because they are different (almost 13 million members worldwide).

44 posted on 06/05/2007 10:06:11 PM PDT by asparagus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas
Reopening old wounds between religions is neither healthy nor productive. The Catholic Church and the LDS Church have a really good relationship and work together on issues such as teenage pregnancy, adoption, and gay marriage. There was a time when the Catholic Church was openly criticized in the Church. Today, the Church strives to follow the golden rule when it comes to speaking of other churches. Working together, the different faiths in this country can do much good.

In addition, the Church does not comment on elections nor does it encourage people to vote for one party or another. It encourages its members to vote their conscience. As for this Catholic Bishop, he would be wise to follow this counsel and leave the politics out of the church.

45 posted on 06/05/2007 10:10:05 PM PDT by asparagus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

Actually, I was responding to HitmanLV’s comment - the Founding Father’s detested democracy with good reason, they thought it was mob rule. Pilate gave in to the mob on the crucifixion. Thus my comment on the wolves and sheep voting for dinner. You are correct about King Herod being evil - I don’t think Pilate was; he was in a difficult position and did not want Jesus’s death.

For an interesting analysis of politics, read “Democracy, the God that Failed.” by Professor Hoppe.


46 posted on 06/05/2007 11:18:47 PM PDT by Howard Jarvis Admirer (Howard Jarvis, the foe of the tax collector and friend of the California homeowner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Howard Jarvis Admirer

Of course, quite correct about Pilate. The Passion and Death of Our Lord as described by the Evangelists is also gripping political drama. Always wondered how the chief priests would make good on their threat to denounce Pilate as `no friend of Rome’.

Did they have Emperor Tiberius’ email address?

;^)


47 posted on 06/06/2007 3:14:15 AM PDT by elcid1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: asparagus

“Freepers posting ignorant and bigoted statements about one of the largest churches in the country, simply because they are different (almost 13 million members worldwide).”

A cult is a cult is a cult. I don’t care how large it grows, it will NEVER be legitimate or even errant Christianity - it is a perversion of Christ’s teaching started by the David Koresh of his time. It may no longer present an outward temporal danger (the militia that Smith ran), but it produces a much more insidious one, it leads men to hell and blinds them to the truth.


48 posted on 06/06/2007 6:03:58 AM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: asparagus

“Working together, the different faiths in this country can do much good.”

Is the enemy of my enemy always my friend? No, of course not. We are just simply co-beligerents that have a common enemy. Look I’m not advocating wiping out mormons, I’m just not going to do ANYTHING to give them legitamacy by electing one to high office, anymore than I would a homosexual or other deviant.


49 posted on 06/06/2007 6:08:29 AM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas

We don’t need your vote to be legitimate. That view is far too arrogant.


50 posted on 06/06/2007 8:10:13 AM PDT by asparagus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Howard Jarvis Admirer

Pure democracy is mob rule and exactly the reason the Founders gave us the Republic.

However, I don’t understand how any Christian can be pro-life and pro-war. It isn’t consistent. The sad thing is, if you look back in history, there are more wars fought “in the name of God” than for any other reason.

This is why we really need to at least listen to Ron Paul as he is the only candidate that is pro-life and anti-war. We, as Christian Americans, need to take the higher moral ground here. We should love the unborn and the born even if they don’t believe or live the same way we do. Instead of killing them(in the name of spreading the democracy that we don’t have), why don’t we be an example of Christ and love them anyway?

BTW - Ron Paul attends a Baptist Church regularly.


51 posted on 06/06/2007 9:22:27 AM PDT by The Oak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

“Who is Ted Kenedy?”

Let’s see....he let a girl drown in his car while he’s drunk.....and he’s not pro-life.

That would make him pro-death is both situations, right?

If I had was threatened and had to make a choice between Ted and Rudy, I’d take Rudy cuz you can’t kill someone with a flip-flop.


52 posted on 06/06/2007 9:22:33 AM PDT by The Oak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: asparagus

“We don’t need your vote to be legitimate. That view is far too arrogant.”

Deal with it, I’m called the Religious Right and a force to be reconded with. You MUST have my vote to win a primary and a general election. We can’t stomach Rudy because he is liberal and Romney because he is a cultist.

Those of my “ilk” are the base of the party. If we say “back off”, to proceed is folly. This isn’t arrogance, it is fact.


53 posted on 06/06/2007 5:28:39 PM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson