Bill would help unwed couples - Plan expands rights of all heterosexual domestic partners.

Sacramento Bee ^ | 6/5/7 | Aurelio Rojas

[HKMk23]

So, committed, bad; uncommitted, victimized?

Evan Sayet is right.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1806173/posts

[Inquisitive1]

Choose One of the Following:
1. Married by law
2. Domestic Partners, because illegal to Marry by law
3. Domestic Partners, because legal but no desire to Marry by law
4. Domestic Partners- Animal Partner
5. Domestic Partners- Sister, Cousin, Aunt, Uncle, Other_____

[fwdude]

"This bill proposes to expand domestic partnerships and benefits to all adult couples who desire to form domestic partnership relationships," the San Francisco Democrat [Carole Migden] said on the floor of the Senate.

Then by your flawed, insane San Francisco logic ANY adult couple should be validated by allowing them to form a partnership: Father and adult son, grandmother and adult son, twin brothers, etc. You have no more "moral" authority to restrict the partnership to anything less than no-holds-barred marriage than the "traditionalists" who champion traditional man-woman marriage. What a raving moron.

[varon]

the emerging new definition of marriage

WTF is with these people that they need to redefine something just to meet their needs. Would a man wearing a dress be considered to be a woman?