Skip to comments.
Walk away from the United Nations
The Washington Times ^
| June 4, 2007
| Nat Hentoff
Posted on 06/04/2007 12:25:09 PM PDT by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: neverdem; Abram; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; amchugh; ...
Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
21
posted on
06/05/2007 8:09:34 AM PDT
by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
To: TonyRo76
Then, we should also run the UN itself out of Turtle Bay, and let them resettle someplace like The Hague.Actually Tony, i was thinking that they should be on some "international" land. The Antartic is the only appropriate ground that i can recall meeting that qualification.
It would do a lot for the parking problem at it's present location.
22
posted on
06/05/2007 8:18:40 AM PDT
by
Calvinist_Dark_Lord
((I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper))
To: Stayfree
Wish we had someone in power with the round things to do that.
23
posted on
06/05/2007 8:40:51 AM PDT
by
mcshot
("Some are inert and some are ert" military training truism from Pvt Benjamin)
To: neverdem
Walk away from the United Nations I disagree.
Why should we walk away, they are in the US, just kick them out.
24
posted on
06/05/2007 8:42:06 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
(The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
Comment #25 Removed by Moderator
To: traviskicks
Do it!
26
posted on
06/05/2007 9:39:36 AM PDT
by
Lady Jag
(A positive attitude will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.)
To: neverdem
Just doing what government does only on a global scale. Govt. doesn’t recognize acheivement it recognizes coercing obedience and the ability to point a gun at a person’s head to force compliance.
The ability to pull the trigger and destroy those who don’t get on with the program is the highest acheivement government can recognize. This encourages govt. growth and consolidation of expanding power.
The UN is a world governing body and few places understand freedom so in that sphere he is a perfect candidate for a high post.
27
posted on
06/05/2007 9:45:37 AM PDT
by
TheKidster
(you can only trust government to grow, consolidate power and infringe upon your liberties.)
To: neverdem
Bump. Nat Hentoff is one of the few libs with any common sense at all. And he’s a wonderful author to boot.
28
posted on
06/05/2007 9:46:20 AM PDT
by
lesser_satan
(FRED THOMPSON '08)
To: neverdem
I would happily vote YES to a US subsidized building for the UN in Antwerp if they would just GET OUT OF THE USA. It would be a great use of funds if we could rid ourselves of those pests.
Question: Which republican candidate for president has openly stated that one of his goals is the withdrawal of the USA from the United Nations?
To: dervish
30
posted on
06/05/2007 2:05:17 PM PDT
by
knighthawk
(We will always remember We will always be proud We will always be prepared so we may always be free)
To: neverdem
Screw the UN. Withdraw from them, expel them from Manhattan all American territory, and bulldoze the Secretariat into the East River.
To: DreamsofPolycarp
I’m guessing it’s the same one who blamed us for 9-11 (he who shall not be named).
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I’m guessing it’s the same one who blamed us for 9-11
buzzz, sorry, liars are eliminated. thank you SO MUCH for playing, though. let me know when you get more than 5 neurons firing at once and we will let you answer ANOTHER question, ok? gooooooood
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson