Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Continue To Urge Support Of Tiahrt Amendment
NRA-ILA ^ | Friday, June 01, 2007 | NRA-ILA

Posted on 06/04/2007 7:32:06 AM PDT by EdReform


·11250 Waples Mill Road ·   Fairfax, Virginia 22030    ·800-392-8683

 
Continue To Urge Support Of Tiahrt Amendment
 
Friday, June 01, 2007
 

For more than five years, cities suing the gun industry and anti-gun organizations have sought access to confidential law enforcement data on firearm traces — records that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE) compiles when it traces firearms in response to requests from law enforcement agencies. 

Every year since 2003, the U.S. Congress has passed increasingly strong language to keep this information confidential. The legislation—a series of "riders" to the appropriations bill that funds BATFE—is widely known as the "Tiahrt Amendment," after its sponsor, Rep. Todd Tiahrt (R-Kan.).  This critically important legislation protects the privacy rights of law-abiding gun owners, the safety of law enforcement officers, and the integrity of criminal investigations by preventing inappropriate release of confidential firearm trace data except in the course of a bona fide criminal investigation. 

On April 30, Michael Sullivan, acting director of the BATFE, had this to say (www.scrippsnews.com/node/22041), "ATF considers this information law-enforcement-sensitive because it is often the first investigative lead in a case.  We treat it no differently than fingerprint matches and other crime-scene information, since disclosure outside of law enforcement can tip off criminals to the investigation, compromise cases and endanger the lives of undercover officers, witnesses and confidential sources."

Please continue to contact your U.S. Representative in support of the Tiahrt Amendment, and remind him or her that NRA and law enforcement remain united in support of this critical legislation. And please be sure to urge your family, friends, and fellow firearm owners to do the same!

You may contact your U.S. Representative at (202) 225-3121. Additional contact information can be found using the "Write Your Representatives" feature at www.NRAILA.org.

(For more information on the "Tiahrt Amendment," please visit: www.nraila.org/Issues/FactSheets/Read.aspx?id=208.)



Find this item at: http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Federal/Read.aspx?id=3062


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: banglist; bloomberg; bloomberggestapo; nra; nraila; tiahrt; tiahrtamendment
Related info:


Bloomberg Cast as Enemy No. 1 of Gun Rights


"The mayors’ gun coalition lobbied successfully to keep the Tiahrt Amendment from becoming law, rather than an annual attachment, last year and has been pressuring Congress this year to kill the provision. Mr. Bloomberg’s criminal justice coordinator, John Feinblatt, is in Washington every week, lobbying representatives and talking strategy with allies. The mayors also opened a Web site, www.protectpolice.org and created a 30-second television advertisement that has been broadcast in Washington and in the districts of members of Congress involved in the appropriations process."


1 posted on 06/04/2007 7:32:08 AM PDT by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

Bang


2 posted on 06/04/2007 7:32:34 AM PDT by EdReform (The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed *NRA*JPFO*SAF *GOA*SAS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; wku man; SLB; ...
Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!
3 posted on 06/04/2007 7:41:28 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

If Bloomberg’s against it, I’m all for it! ‘Course I think we should just dismantle BATFE(ces) in the first place, but this is a good start!


4 posted on 06/04/2007 8:06:15 AM PDT by Andonius_99 (There are two sides to every issue. One is right, the other is wrong; but the middle is always evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EdReform

Man, it hurts to bad to have to agree with the BATF on something.


5 posted on 06/04/2007 8:10:04 AM PDT by NorthFlaRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthFlaRebel

OK.

In what way do you agree with ATF?


6 posted on 06/04/2007 8:17:17 AM PDT by labette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: labette

Am I misreading this or is the BATF on the side with the NRA that this info should not be given to cities who are trying to sue the gun industry?


7 posted on 06/04/2007 8:45:05 AM PDT by NorthFlaRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NorthFlaRebel
The "Tiahrt Amendment" on Firearms Traces: Protecting Gun Owners' Privacy and Law Enforcement Safety
8 posted on 06/04/2007 9:43:50 AM PDT by EdReform (The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed *NRA*JPFO*SAF *GOA*SAS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NorthFlaRebel

It’s even worse that we have to fund them in order to get this to pass.


9 posted on 06/04/2007 4:21:28 PM PDT by looscnnn ("Those 1s and 0s you stepped in is a memory dump. Please clean your shoes." PC Confusious)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NorthFlaRebel
Apologies for the late reply.

I've read through this a couple of times and still aren't sure what to make of it. The FOP leadership have supported 2-A infringements in the past. And ATF? Hmmmm......

"Be as suspicious of sudden friends as old enemies"

Author unknown.

10 posted on 06/04/2007 4:30:28 PM PDT by labette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EdReform
Funny how the left has fits about the mere idea that the government might look into whether certain people have borrowed certain government owned books from government run libraries, but they have no problem with allowing anyone to find who what individuals ever privately owned any gun that may have later been used in a crime. Never mind that the gun in question may have been legally sold or stolen, and the previous owner had nothing to do with committing the crime. Unlike jihadis reading up on nuclear or chemical engineering, gunowners have no civil rights.
11 posted on 06/04/2007 4:57:01 PM PDT by Hugin (Mecca delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugin
they have no problem with allowing anyone to find who what individuals ever privately owned any gun

Registration leads to confiscation.

There's not a cop within a hundred miles of where I live (northern California) that I'd trust to preserve and protect the 2nd ammendment. Pledges- hardly worth the effort to expel breath.

12 posted on 06/04/2007 9:53:01 PM PDT by budwiesest (Something's gotta give.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: EdReform
Lobbyists Scramble Ahead of 'No. 1' Gun Vote
13 posted on 06/28/2007 9:36:21 AM PDT by EdReform (The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed *NRA*JPFO*SAF *GOA*SAS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdReform
Lobbyists Scramble Ahead of 'No. 1' Gun Vote
14 posted on 06/28/2007 9:38:38 AM PDT by EdReform (The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed *NRA*JPFO*SAF *GOA*SAS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson