Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paperdoll

True, this Bill violate either Article 4 or Article 5 of the US Constitution. I still oppose a wall. It is too costly. Send in the military to FORTIFY the border.


11 posted on 06/03/2007 2:02:53 PM PDT by X-Ecutioner (I am a BAPTIZED christian-right wing libertarian, where do I go?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: X-Ecutioner
“It is too costly.”

It would cost the American taxpayers nothing if we levied a 10% tax on remittances to foreign countries. Twenty percent on those going to Mexico from Western Union and Xoom.

12 posted on 06/03/2007 2:14:31 PM PDT by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: X-Ecutioner

Less bloodshed possible with a double wall. The funds for it are there. What do you think they pay the Military with, peanuts? The bill was signed into law. Let’s enforce at least ONE law here.


14 posted on 06/03/2007 2:18:05 PM PDT by Paperdoll ( Duncan Hunter '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: X-Ecutioner

>I still oppose a wall. It’s too costly.<

Feeding, housing, medicating, jailing and educating millions of illegals PLUS their families not yet here IS TOO COSTLY, IMO. We have the funds for the wall - cheaper at any cost.


15 posted on 06/03/2007 2:21:11 PM PDT by Paperdoll ( Duncan Hunter '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson