[P-40]

It sounds like using slave labor would be the best option. Those slaves would consume less fossil fuel than machines and thus have a lower carbon footprint.

[Political Junkie Too]

Those slaves would consume less fossil fuel than machines and thus have a lower carbon footprint.

And then harvest their organs, and mulch the rest as fertilizer for future generations of crops. 100% reusability leaves no carbon footprint at all.

-PJ

[LibLieSlayer]

“It sounds like using slave labor would be the best option. Those slaves would consume less fossil fuel than machines and thus have a lower carbon footprint.”

Internment work camps for dims and al qaeda... they would get along smashingly. We can extend this into road work, public works, grow our own crops with "low carbon footprint" slave labor and hildebeast would finally be telling the truth about hard times when she says, “I knows wut you talkin’ ‘bout”!

LLS

[calex59]

It sounds like using slave labor would be the best option. Those slaves would consume less fossil fuel than machines and thus have a lower carbon footprint.

Oh, yeah, now the immigration reform bill is making sense,they just forgot to tell us about the "making them slaves" clause./SAR

[dennisw]

It sounds like using slave labor would be the best option. Those slaves would consume less fossil fuel than machines and thus have a lower carbon footprint.

Slaves fart, thus increasing the methane footprint and global warming