Careful on the 'who' and the 'how' of your comparisons here. Clinton is a 'sefl-serving', narcissistic. . .power-addicted; virtueless man whose life is defined by how he defines the meaning of 'is'. He chose politics for personal agrandizement, power and monetary enrichment.
Romney may look like teflon; would offer that he does, in fact. . .and he is nimble with facts; but most importantly; he sticks to the truth of the matter; and lives the values he espouses. . .
Clinton has never let the truth guide him; or stand in his way, by any measure.
In truth; little to compare here. . .
You are trying to persuade me that Clinton is the only deceptive politician here? Please advise me which politicians are not “’sefl-serving’, narcissistic. . .power-addicted; virtueless man (politician) whose life is defined by how he defines the meaning of ‘is’. He (The politician) chose politics for personal agrandizement, power and monetary enrichment.
Romney may look like teflon; would offer that he does, in fact . . . .” Your definition of Clinton covers almost all politicians.
I think you are trying to compare turds here. In politics, very often the choice is not between good and bad, the choice is between bad and worse. Clearly, Romney is a politician’s politician and as such is bad, however Clinton is worse. You may be perceived as naive if you hero worship politicians, whether their name is Romney or Clinton.
PS: Large numbers of Bushbots have finally realized the truth about Jorge after years of work, donations, and hope after the amnesty sellout - don’t be deluded about Clinton, Kyl, Romney, McCain, JulyAnni either - they are all slick double-tongued untrustworthy politicians. IMO,Romney is the best politician for thinking on his feet, I had to admire him in the debate for his skills in talking his way out of hardball questions - and leaving McCain to take the ricochet. For indepth analysis of politicians, google “Why Bad Men Rule” by Professor Hoppe.