O'Reilly show spurs threats over CWA panel

Daily Camera ^ | May 31, 2007 | Emily Tienken

[Jeff Chandler]

talking about the difficulty of maintaining an erection while using condoms, the naturalness of experimenting with same-sex relationships and the benefits of legalizing drugs. A female student also asked the panelists: "Would you have sex with someone you liked? But say he doesn't love you?" The unanimous consensus of the four panel members was "yes."

DEMOCRATS GONE WILD!!!

[South40]

One e-mail, sent to the Camera as well as Garcia, mentions torture and murder as options a "distraught parent" might choose for punishment or revenge against him.

Just make them watch o'reilly's show; that would be torture enough.

[Lorianne]

I think the whole thing is a simple spelling error. The Boulder educators have are missing an ‘l’.

It’s supposed to be public education, not pubic education.

[moonman]

Why are these people running and hiding? All they had to do was agree to discuss and/or debate THEIR actions.

I guess the problem with that is, they can't possible justify their idiot mentality nor their lack of morals and ethical behavior.

[Wil H]

Ultimately, though, he said the district wants to move on.

You bet they do!

They have no defense for their outrageous attempt to corrupt minors and so they just want to ignore it and hope it goes away..

We ain't gonna let it...

[Lorianne]

Talk about miseducation! How many 17 year old boys have difficulty maintaining an erection? I think the speakers must have been talking from personal (older) experience

[Running On Empty]

That has nothing to do with the situation.

It’s not the messenger—it’s the message that matters.

[Anti-Bubba182]

What a headline!

Go Bill Go!

[Greg F]

We’ll be homeschooling.

[Jeff Chandler]

I think the speakers must have been talking from personal (older) experience

I wonder if they brought in Smiling Bob as a guest speaker?

[razzle]

“Just make them watch o’Reilly’s show; that would be torture enough.”

Whats wrong with O’Reilly? Your tagline indicates you don’t agree with Mexican Amnesty, and O’Reilly agrees with you and has been turning up the heat on the Washington types who want open borders. I think his show is excellent.

[Publius6961]

"I have no problem with engaging in constructive dialogue about what's best for kids," Jones said. "However, the e-mails we are getting are threatening in tone, are abusive in language, and I don't think that kind of behavior is at all appropriate in a public dialogue about what's best for the education of our children."

All the responsible adults in this story seem to be adept at "changing the subject" but incompetent at everything else.

Obviously, from the tone of this comment, constructive dialogue is not an option. This brainiac thinks that nothing is rotten in the school district.

Seems to me that the only option non-pervert parents have at this point is the next board election --- better yet, install recall election. Now.

[Vn_survivor_67-68]

anyone who advocates stuff like this to teenagers ought to have a probable cause warrant gotten by Law Enforcement to sieze their home and work computers for a search for further evidence of contributing to the delinquence of minors..........anyone wanna bet that one or more of them are predators?

[caveat emptor]

Just make them watch o'reilly's show; that would be torture enough.

Yeah, it's painful alright, but he sure manages to put pressure on a lot of miscreants.

[cripplecreek]

anyone wanna bet that one or more of them are predators?

To me they sound like people who have never grown up, want to party with teenagers, and normalize relations with young girls and boys.

[South40]

Whats wrong with O’Reilly?

I used to watch him a lot. But I just can't get passed him having said the Swift Boat Veterans, men who fought for this country, had no right to be heard. He may not have agreed with their message but they had every right to be heard. He also refers to the race-monger al charlatan as "a friend of the factor", which he no doubt is. The fact that he calls reverend al friend speaks volumes.

He's just another ratings whore no different from whoraldo.

[Sans-Culotte]

I used to watch O'Reilly a lot, but, I too got turned off by his ignorance on some issues, and his tendency to bring in a substitute to beat up on when he cannot get a "real" guest.

However, he is great at bringing stories like this Boulder one to the public's attention. Remember, O'Reilly has never claimed to be a conservative. I am less disappointed in O'Reilly than I am in RINOs like G.W. Bush.

[South40]

I don't care for either one of them.

And I am well aware o'reilly claims not to be a consrvative. He also claims not to be a liberal. His political leanings notwithstanding, he was dead wrong in stating the Swift Boat Vets had no right to be heard; he was effectively trying to silence them. Why? He was pandering to john kerry with the hope that doing so would result in kerry making an appearance on his show.

Like I said, ratings whore.

[Bogtrotter52]

While he is far from having “jumped the shark”, the “body language” segment to me is right up there with Phrenology I could also do without the weekly “Culture Quiz”. I like him for serious subject matter. For comedy I can watch “My Name Is Earl.”