Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: B4Ranch
Our forefathers who fought and died for this country made it what it is. If we won’t do our share to protect it then we don’t deserve to live here either.

It's almost "domestic enemies" time, I'd say. What are the alternatives, when we are being railroaded out of our national legacy by traitors?

70 posted on 06/02/2007 9:35:46 AM PDT by Travis McGee (--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Travis McGee

It’s past time, way past time to bring sanity to our soil.


75 posted on 06/02/2007 9:40:51 AM PDT by B4Ranch (Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: Travis McGee; All

“It’s almost “domestic enemies” time, I’d say. What are the alternatives, when we are being railroaded out of our national legacy by traitors?”

I wonder if this isn’t tucked away in the 1000 page Amnesty Bill? Anyone read through it enough to know, cause she’s intent on seeing it added somewhere to something:

“Sinema takes on the Minutemen
03/10/2006 12:20 AM

In this week’s Phoenix New Times, the news column called “The Bird” goes on and on about how state Rep. Kyrsten Sinema, D-Phoenix, has introduced a great bill to crack down on the Minuteman Project and any other civilian border patrol groups.

Of course, “The Bird” stresses “that the Phoenix lefty’s bill hasn’t a snowball’s chance in the Sonoran Desert of becoming law.”

That’s an unfortunate consequence of belonging to the Legislature’s minority party. Majority Republicans rarely allow Democrat-sponsored bills to get very far. In the event a Republican shares or appreciates a Democrat’s idea, he or she usually introduces a GOP version of the bill.

And sure enough, Sinema’s House Bill 2848, which would outlaw armed border civilian patrol groups and classify them as “domestic terrorists,” never even got a committee hearing.

Still, Plugged In was intrigued enough by the longshot legislation that we contacted Sinema about it.

Despite the nearly impossible odds, she writes in an e-mail that she’s not giving up:

“I attempted to amend it to another bill (during floor debate Wednesday), HB 2582, but after quite a bit of lively debate and discussion, my motion failed.

“I will attempt to amend this bill to other germane bills as the session proceeds, as I believe that this issue is one of great importance. Vigilante action is very dangerous and leads to dangerous and sometimes tragic results. Our country has always opposed vigilantism, and we should continue to do so.

“In fact, the Arizona Constitution states in Article 2, Section 26 that ‘The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself or the state shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain, or employ an armed body of men.’

“So this bill is in keeping with our country and state’s commitment to the orderly rule of law.”

We’ve got to agree with New Times on at least one point. In the current anti-immigrant climate at the State Capitol, Sinema’s principled stand does take guts.”


94 posted on 06/02/2007 10:18:40 AM PDT by Kimberly GG (DUNCAN HUNTER '08.....lframerica.com.....MARCH TO TAKE BACK AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson