Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: leadpenny

After hearing Thompson speak about wanting to increase free trade with China (he is a Globalist who strongly supports free trade with China), maybe someone should tell him its not a wise platform to run on.

After reading about the poisoned pet food and now the warning to throw away toothpaste made in China, free trade with China should not continue or increase it should be stopped totally till further notice.
http://www.rr.com/flash/index.cfm?rev=10217
“WASHINGTON(AP) The government warned consumers on Friday to avoid using toothpaste made in China because it may contain a poisonous chemical used in antifreeze. Out of caution, the Food and Drug Administration said, people should throw away toothpaste with labeling that says it was made in China. The FDA is concerned that these products may contain diethylene glycol.”

Tell the candidates and current pols to stop free trade with China there appears to be a trend with imports from there.


2 posted on 06/02/2007 3:52:22 AM PDT by stopem (God Bless the U.S.A AND the Troops who protect her, and their Commander In Chief.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: stopem

I can live with Thompson’s position on trade much better than Rudy’s position on abortion, gays, guns, etc.


3 posted on 06/02/2007 3:55:32 AM PDT by deaconjim (Because He lives...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: stopem
After hearing Thompson speak about wanting to increase free trade with China (he is a Globalist who strongly supports free trade with China), maybe someone should tell him its not a wise platform to run on.

Sen Thompson has always recognized a Chinese threat. He was a key author of the China Nonproliferation Act where he said on the floor:

"One of the primary reasons we need a national missile defense system has to do with the activities of the Chinese and their supplying of rogue nations with these materials, expertise, capabilities, military parts that have nuclear capabilities which we are so concerned that, by the year of 2005, could be turned against us. Must we not consider this as we consider permanent normal trade relations? As important as trade is, is it more important than our national security? I think that question answers itself."

I believe the original was voted down. Later, he revised it and was always very serious about Chinese enforcement. You can read more about it here.

Here is also a good spot to do some Fred research.
10 posted on 06/02/2007 1:14:49 PM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson