Newsbusters is a website dedicated to exposing libmedia bias.
inauthenticity that competes as one of her great many political problems
Fixed.
HF
The DC Bar exam is one of the easiest in the nation, but failing the Bar is not the big news here.
“has led a camouflaged life, and continues to”
“she has misrepresented not just facts but often her essential self”
“raises a very interesting question about her feminism”
We are getting closer and closer to someone dropping The Big Hillary Factoid Bomb.
How many different ways do you suppose a person can be discredited a a presidential candidate and still be considered the odds-on favorite?How many books can detail specific reasons someone should never even see the oval office, let alone be elected to it - and still be the frontrunner?
The bottom line is that she's a socialist, and so are the arrogant journalists who proclaim their own superior "objectivity." If being sympatico with Big Journalism automatically got you elected, no Democrat would ever lose. But if the support of Big Journalism were not an enormous benefit, no Democrat would ever win.
It was absolutely astounding how Bush and Gore's academic records were reported, with Gore always characterized as being the smartest guy in the room, and Bush being portrayed as a dunce. Bush may had an average academic record on his way through Yale and Harvard Business School. Gore's academic record was simply horrible in places. He flunked out of Divinty School at Vanderbilt altogether, and he got D's and F's in the handful of science classes he took as an undergraduate.
His academic background in science is so poor, that it is absolutely shocking that Gore is taken seriously now when speaking on science issues. My son's middle school science teacher likes to harp on Global Warming, and he was not pleased when my son pointed out Gore's horrible science background to the glass and got a big laugh.
I'm no fan of Bernstein, but if the Illegal Immigration Crisis results in terrorists' attacks on the U.S.A., the empowerment of the Democrat Party, or some other irreparable damage to America, I may have to agree with him.
The neat Red/Blue divide in the U.S. shows signs of failing. This may be temporary. It may solidify again as the 2008 election approaches.
People who faced off as Left or Right in recent years show evidence of less rigid alliances.
Widespread criticism of President Bush and condemnation of the Open Border policy, on both sides of the divide, is part of it but not all of it.
Both Leftists and those on the Right seem to have less of a knee-jerk reaction to things and more of a tendency to sort things out, idea by idea.
Hillary savaging the women that he was with. Forgiving Bill Clinton repeatedly through their married life, but not forgiving the women, which raises a very interesting question about her feminism.
The joke going around D.C. is that the D.C. madam preferred to hire Wellesley graduates, because of their high degree of professionalism.
Hillary was a Wellesley graduate.
Smartest-Woman-In-The-World-Flunks-Bar-Exam BUMP
Somehow I can’t help but think that Carl Bernstein’s book is being released now so that the MSM can later say “Hey - that is OLD news, we’ve already discussed this, so we’ll ignore it - Let’s move on,” when we continue to bring these things up and criticize her in depth, closer to the actual ‘08 election when voters start turning their attention to the campaigns.
Bernstein probably wrote & edited the book with the Clinton’s hands-on help, they sat down with a calendar & planned the release date together ...etc.
I wouldn’t put anything past them or the MSM; I’ve been watching all this for too long.
Prior discussion on prior threads.
I'm guessing you never took a bar exam... They're definitely very hard, and what you learned in law school may not be on the bar exam.
Didn’t Ted Kennedy get caught cheating on the exam? Or was that just a college exam?
“no apparent axe to grind”
Does not pass the smell test.
