Nice try PB. The Sky is in our atmosphere and our atmosphere can be "physically" studied. The Sun cannot.
Let me be clear. I have no problems with science asking questions and drawing conclusions based upon their limited understanding and then presenting their sparse findings as "theories" but I do have a problem with supposed scientists stating that something is a "FACT" based upon data gleaned from a faulty method in the first place. I call such conclusions of "fact" as "Junk-Science" and I believe rightly so.
Claiming anything about the Sun outside of the fact that it is hot and a burning ball of fire (
You know? Your most basic observations?) as a "FACT" without actual physical evidence taken directly from the Sun without all the unknowns between us and it or the unknowns it by itself may possess is "Junk-Science."
The original post in this thread is fascinating but the assertions of fact ruin what it is saying.