Prove it. Tell me exactly who shot Kennedy, where they were standing and how that scenario matches the trajectories.
Every single “theorists” has to out and out lie in order to claim some sort of wacked out conspiracy.
I think its plausible that Oswald got off all shots but for sure he was not acting alone. I think the mob and KGB were in cahoots - maybe Johnson too.
Is that important?
I have a certain affection for David Scheim's book Contract on America: The Mafia Murder of John F.Kennedy which goes into intricate detial about who might have wanted to kill JFK, what their friends and accquainatnces thought, while ommitting all mention of what actually happened in Dealy Plaza on the day.
“Prove it. Tell me exactly who shot Kennedy, where they were standing and how that scenario matches the trajectories.”
You ought read “Mortal Error” by Bonar Menninger which recounts the work of ballistics expert Howard Donahue. Donahue studied the “trajectories” exactly as you demand. His conclusion (and this ought go over real well with some on here):the fatal shot which killed Kennedy was accidentally fired from an AR-15 carried in a follow-up Secret Service vehicle.
Ok, so before this theory (and me) get pilloried, I recommend critics at least read the book and then judge.
Personal note:I have read quite a few books on the assassination, including Jim Garrison’s “On the Trail of the Assassins”; and though I don’t claim to be an expert, Menninger’s is about the only one I know of that looks at the ballistics evidence scientifically. I am not saying he is right, but it is a provocative work.
You can’t prove that Oswald did it anymore than someone can prove that the mafia, or the Cubans or the CIA, or whoever did it. Besides, stating that the Warren Commission findings are flawed (which they are) doesn’t require someone to prove the alternative theory.
I have no idea what happened to Emilia Earheart (sp??). However, while I can say without question that I (or you) didn’t kill her, but I can’t prove that.