Still waiting to see dschapin’s answer.
And while we are waiting for that answer, I’d like it if someone would tell me why the social cons won’t allow us fiscal/small government/libertarian cons have a few terms at the helm. We banded together with the social cons to give them President Bush who forwarded their agenda on abortion, gay marriage and stem cell research even as he transgressed our agendas on such things as the prescription drug benefit, McCain/Feingold, and no child left behind to name just a few. Why can’t they support one of our candidates who may not be as vigorous on social issues especially if it means the difference between winning the presidency and losing it in the general election. Its our turn.