Posted on 06/01/2007 9:07:31 AM PDT by ellery
Behind Rudy Giuliani's impressive lead in the polls is one fact that puzzles the pundits: Many cultural conservatives are backing a pro-choice, pro-gun control candidate. But what should be equally surprising is the strong support Giuliani is finding among libertarian-leaning Republicans, who also make up a big slice of the GOP base.
Here's why: Throughout his career, Giuliani has displayed an authoritarian streak that would be all the more problematic in a man who would assume executive powers vastly expanded by President Bush.
As a U.S. attorney in the 1980s, Giuliani conducted what University of Chicago Law Prof. Daniel Fischel called a "reign of terror" against Wall Street. He pioneered the use of the midday, televised "perp walk" for white-collar defendants who posed no threat to the community - precisely the sort of power play for which conservatives reviled former state Attorney General Eliot Spitzer. And Giuliani's use of federal racketeering statutes was so disturbing that the Justice Department changed its guidelines on the law.
As mayor, Giuliani had many successes. Crime came down. He cut taxes and held down spending. But his prosecutorial personality sometimes threatened personal freedoms. He cracked down on jaywalkers and street vendors. His street crime unit used aggressive tactics to confiscate guns from city residents, resulting in wholesale searches and detentions of citizens, especially young minority males, and occasional tragedies like the shooting of the unarmed Amadou Diallo.
When a police officer fatally shot another unarmed black man, Patrick Dorismond, Giuliani had police release Dorismond's sealed juvenile arrest record. The city later settled with Dorismond's family for $2.25 million.
And it should distress many conservatives that Giuliani took umbrage at affronts to his dignity, perhaps most notoriously when he tried to stop city buses from carrying a New York magazine ad saying the publication was "possibly the only good thing in New York Rudy hasn't taken credit for." The First Amendment lawyer Floyd Abrams notes in his book, "Speaking Freely," that "over 35 separate successful lawsuits were brought against the city under Giuliani's stewardship arising out of his insistence on doing the one thing that the First Amendment most clearly forbids: using the power of government to restrict or punish speech critical of government itself."
As a presidential hopeful, Giuliani's authoritarian streak is as strong as ever. He defends the Bush administration's domestic surveillance program. He endorses the President's power to arrest American citizens, declare them enemy combatants and hold them without access to a lawyer or a judge. He thinks the President has "the inherent authority to support the troops" even if Congress were to cut off war funding, a claim of presidential authority so sweeping that even Bush and his supporters have not tried to make it.
Giuliani's view of power would be dangerous at any time, but especially after two terms of relentless Bush efforts to weaken the constitutional checks and balances that safeguard our liberty.
In 1964, Barry Goldwater declared it "the cause of Republicanism to resist concentrations of power." George W. Bush has forgotten that; Rudy Giuliani rejects it.
Boaz, executive vice president of the Cato Institute, is author of "Libertarianism: A Primer."
Bears repeating.
Rudy does not love freedom. He loves only power.
So much for Hannity’s self-described libertarianism. IMHO, the only candidates small-l libertarians can get behind are Fred and Hunter.
That is exactly why I despise Rudy. Go Fred!
You forget, of course, Ron Paul (who I wouldn’t vote for again.)
Well actually it should only be Ron Paul. Liberventionists can get behind whoever they want.
Huh? I’m a libertarian and I would no more vote for Guiliani than I would McCain. Just because he’s less of a conservative than Romney doesn’t make him appealing to libertarians.
Geve me Fred or give me Newt. Otherwise, if the election were today, I’d sit it out.
I woiuldn’t vote for Giuliani either, because he’s an authoritarian with no respect for Constitutional limits on government. However, I’ve run into plenty of people here and on other sites who define themselves as libertarian and support Giuliani. David Boaz, the author of this piece, has experienced the same thing. Giuliani himself is trying to whitewash his past and pretend that he is a champion of individual liberty (what a laugh).
A surprising number of people are buying into it — I think it’s a false dichotomy whereby people think that if a rupublican isn’t a social/religious conservative, he/she must be a libertarian.
Heee! I have to ping dirtboy on this, as he is a notorious ferret sympathizer, obviously much like yourself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.