Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zeugma
LOL. You are certainly welcome to take up esperanto.

Ha ha. You respond with an extreme. As I pointed out, almost every other language has had spelling reform and they are now much easier to use. We don't need to invent a new language due to the difficulties in English. We just need to simplify the spelling system in English. What is so frightening about fixing our language so that it is written in the same way that it sounds?

64 posted on 05/31/2007 10:59:22 PM PDT by burzum (None shall see me, though my battlecry may give me away -Minsc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: burzum
Ha ha. You respond with an extreme.

I should have put a smiley in there. :-)

I understand the problems with english for non-natives. Personally, I don't have much problems with it myself. If you are really a stickler about spelling, most of the time, if you run into a word you can't spell, there are normally at least 3 other ways to say the same thing that you can.

If "we" decide to 'reform' spelling, it will inevitably lead to a 'reform' of grammar as well. I mean, if you really want to get a non-native speaker riled up about english as a language, start a discussion of tenses! If they start revising grammar, they are likely to get rid of zeugmas entirely, as it is a pretty obscure part of speech to begin with. That would suck.

Maybe it's just the old conservative in me, but I can live with things as they are.

117 posted on 06/01/2007 6:50:00 AM PDT by zeugma (MS Vista has detected your mouse has moved, Cancel or Allow?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson