Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. to admit more Iraqi refugees
AP via Monterey Herald ^ | May 31 2007 | U.S. to admit more Iraqi refugees

Posted on 05/31/2007 3:20:30 PM PDT by Sleeping Beauty

WASHINGTON — The United States will soon begin admitting a bigger trickle of the more than 2 million refugees who have fled Iraq, acknowledging for the first time the country may never be safe for some who have helped the U.S.

After months of agonizing delays and withering criticism from advocacy groups and lawmakers, the Bush administration has finalized new guidelines to screen Iraqi refugees, including those seeking asylum because helping the Americans has put them at huge risk.

The 2 million-plus people — the fastest growing refugee population in the world — have left Iraq, but Washington has balked at allowing them into the United States for security reasons.

Since the war began in 2003, fewer than 800 Iraqi refugees have been admitted, angering critics who argued the United States is obligated to assist many more, particularly those whose work for American agencies or contractors placed them in danger.

Now, under enhanced screening measures aimed at weeding out potential terrorists — announced this week by the Department of Homeland Security — the administration plans to allow nearly 7,000 Iraqis to resettle in the United States by the end of September.

An initial group of 59, including former U.S. government employees and their families, should arrive in the coming weeks, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said.

As with incoming refugees from other countries, Iraqis accepted for resettlement in the U.S. will be given assistance from government and private aid agencies, including language and job training in the communities that will be their new homes, officials said.

"America's tradition of welcoming international refugees and responding to humanitarian emergencies is unrivaled," Chertoff said in a statement. "Yet we also must be mindful of the security risks associated with admitting refugees from war-torn countries — especially countries infiltrated by large numbers of terrorists."

Homeland Security officials would not discuss what the enhanced process entails, but several people familiar with the program said it includes additional interviews, biometric screening and cross checks against employer databases, none of which are necessarily required for non-Iraqi refugees.

The 59 Iraqis who will arrive soon are among a group of more than 700 considered to be the most vulnerable and for whom resettlement interviews have been conducted, the department said.

They include "persons whose lives may be in jeopardy because they worked for coalition forces," it said, without giving specific numbers of former U.S. employees.

Refugee advocates Wednesday praised the announcement but lamented that many Iraqis have been languishing in camps in other Mideast countries.

"Obviously, DHS has a responsibility to make sure that everybody who comes into the country is going to be a good citizen ... but they also realize that the country has a responsibility to these Iraqis," said Kenneth Bacon of Refugees International.

"My hope is that with this they will begin a large-scale resettlement program," he said. "We are very disappointed that there are so few now, but I have hope for the future."

Refugees International is one of several groups pushing the administration to accept at least a fraction of the Iraqis and noted that other countries, including some Scandinavian nations, have agreed to accept tens of thousands.

"It is embarrassing that Sweden is taking more refugees than we are," Bacon said. "The U.S. should be doing much more."

That complaint has been echoed on Capitol Hill where the Senate and House earlier this month passed legislation allowing a tenfold increase in special immigrant visas for Iraqis and Afghans who worked as translators and interpreters for U.S. forces.

"America has a fundamental obligation to help those brave Iraqis who put their lives on the line by working for our government," said Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., who co-sponsored the Senate bill with Richard Lugar, R-Ind.

As of May 18, the United Nations had identified 4,692 Iraqi refugees at camps in Syria, Jordan, Turkey, Lebanon and Egypt for possible resettlement in the United States.

Officials said they expect that number to rise to about 7,000 by Sept. 30 and the U.S. hopes to admit as many as possible.

"We fully intend and expect to be able to handle 7,000 referrals," deputy State Department spokesman Tom Casey said. "This is very good news that this has now been arranged."

The State Department's Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration, which deals with refugee resettlement, said communities around the United States have been identified as destinations for the first batch of Iraqis but would not disclose them pending arrival.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; immigration; iraq; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: LouAvul

Many moons ago I worked in the medical field for a group that was funded by a government subsidy. These people were supposed to come to the clinic during the day if they were ill, but NOOOOOO they waited until night time with their earaches and sore throats etc to go to the emergency room. I know because I was the one who the ER called for authorization to treat and when I denied the service, the nurse would say well you tell them - I was threatened with bodily harm on many occasions.

If there was a full moon........OY!!

Obviously the gov program went broke anyway.


21 posted on 05/31/2007 4:27:31 PM PDT by WestCoastGal ( The JUNIOR NATION is VERY proud of our driver. You drive we'll follow! There ain't no turning back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Beauty

What we’ve got here is a failure to communicate!

I believe the real goal in this is big government movement is NO BORDERS, break the budget and level-the-playing field. We do it first and then try to convince the world to go along with us. I am sure they will—they always do. What a crock. Sorry but I think these people need to stay in their own country and fight for their own freedom. A mosque soon to be in every neighborhood and Shiara Law in every community. I am sick to my stomach.


22 posted on 05/31/2007 4:29:09 PM PDT by Snoopers-868th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Beauty
"Oh well. I'm off to get a pedicure at my local Vietnamese Nail Parlor..."

If you're serious I hope you bring your own nail tools etc. I've recently seen horror stories of fungus and stuff people are getting in nail parlors. Nothing is safe anymore. :(

23 posted on 05/31/2007 4:30:12 PM PDT by WestCoastGal ( The JUNIOR NATION is VERY proud of our driver. You drive we'll follow! There ain't no turning back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Beauty

Very, very bad news. Great, now we used to have “sleeper terrorist cells” some of which have been traced, and now we’ll just import more!!!!


24 posted on 05/31/2007 4:33:45 PM PDT by zerosix (Native Sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Beauty

It’s beginning to look like there are people in government who will not rest until the entire world is in the US. It at least makes the Wall St. Journal happy...


25 posted on 05/31/2007 4:59:43 PM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Beauty

Maaybe I am waaay off base, here, but aren’t these the people who should be building the new Iraq, not leaving?


26 posted on 05/31/2007 10:04:24 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Beauty

Open season on America. Come one come all, no license required. Blackbird.


27 posted on 06/01/2007 9:55:05 AM PDT by BlackbirdSST (Just when you think it can't possibly get any worse, another day dawns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
Maaybe I am waaay off base, here, but aren’t these the people who should be building the new Iraq, not leaving?

Bringing them here is a sign that we're readying for the coming pullout. This is what happened in Vietnam, too, if you remember.

I'm not enthused about an extra 7K muzzies in the US, but we're forced to do this. We still have a long ways to go in the war on terror, and if we just leave these ones who helped us to die, then no one will ever work with us again, except for spies and infiltrators.

I'm dead sure that an awful lot of the 7,000 did so with the hope of getting a free ticket to the USA, but they took an incredible risk in doing so. There are probably at least another 7,000 who have, or are going to die for it.

28 posted on 06/01/2007 10:26:24 AM PDT by hunter112 (Change will happen when very good men are forced to do very bad things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Sleeping Beauty

Perhaps this is the reason that another attack on the US is expected.


29 posted on 06/01/2007 10:29:46 AM PDT by WhiteGuy (GOP Congress - 16,000 earmarks costing US $50 billion in 2006 - PAUL2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson