But, even I would know not to get on an airplane if I was diagnosed with TB and I am not exactly House, M.D.
I also think that the Father-in-law who "just happens" to work for CDC on TB is too odd. Something isn't right here.
Yep. I think the CDC is 1) trying to cover its tracks, 2) overreacting wildly now, as part of its efforts to obscure its previous underreaction. This poor guy is little more than a pawn in the whole thing. The father in law is obviously quite knowledgeable about this stuff, and wasn’t alarmed enough about his daughter running off on a honeymoon with this guy to sound the alarm and try to stop that from happening. Translation: the guy’s potential for transmission is very, very, very, very low (as in the people who sat next to him on the planes should be more worried about getting hit by lightning on a sunny day), and when he left on the trip there was even less reason to be alarmed, since his TB strain had not yet been identified as an “extensively resistant” type.
Are there are any mild forms of TB? I would not want the person next to me on a plane to have an ordinary cold, much less TB of any kind.
He was told to put off his wedding. He flew to Greece anyway. Also, the CDC probably did not get involved with the TB case until they found out what strain it was. Until then, it was probably handled by a private physician.
I’m wondering how he was ever diagnosed. As a lawyer, why would he need a TB test? Did he get diagnosed by a TB test or chest x-ray. He probably had something going on that required testing. He’s probably more infectious than they say.