[Non-Sequitur]

It does not strike me as anti-science or anti-reason to question the philosophical presuppositions behind theories offered by scientists who, in excluding the possibility of design or purpose, venture far beyond their realm of empirical science.

Why does it strike him as anti-religion when those same scientists question the theological foundations of Intelligent Design based on their experiments and the evidence they have uncovered?

[Just mythoughts]

Why does it strike him as anti-religion when those same scientists question the theological foundations of Intelligent Design based on their experiments and the evidence they have uncovered?

Maybe he should have used the more direct and correct wording anti-Creator, when those same scientist deny the creation and purpose of the flesh man.

[MEGoody]

Why does it strike him as anti-religion when those same scientists question the theological foundations of Intelligent Design based on their experiments and the evidence they have uncovered?

Can you provide any evidence of honest questions being asked? All I ever see is proclamations that ID is not science, surrounded by personal insults to whoever dares to claim they believe in it.