Replies

Hi Hunter112, thanks for the reply. I would think, if he was 100% pro-life, he would say "I believe abortion should be illegal, so Roe V. Wade should be overturned. I would then push for an amendment like the Human Rights Amendment to be ratified because I believe human life begins at conception. Until that amendment is passed, I would like to see each state ban abortions with an exception for saving the LIFE of the mother."

To me, that's the pro-life position and would solidify the conservative base. If he doesn't believe that, that's fine and he needs to just lay out his true position, whatever that may be.

Take care.

And that would guarantee that he wouldn't stand a chance of being elected to anything besides dog catcher. The lamestream media would shred him like meat for a taco. Incrementalism is the way that the great injustices of the past have been rectified, I see that applying here, too. Hopefully, the libertarian baby boom generation will come to its senses as they age, and see the folly of having snuffed out their grandchildren's generation.

Even Romney's new revised position on abortion is good enough for me, since I think he was really there all along, and just willing to lie to the voters in Massachusetts to get elected as their governor. What is completely unacceptable to me is Rudy Giuliani's decision to completely abandon the cause of people working to limit, or eliminate elective convenience abortion.