Posted on 05/29/2007 4:18:22 PM PDT by Sybeck1
What?! What’s the deal with that?
Trent Lott!
For a minute there, I thought you were talking about John R. Lott Jr., the author of More Guns, Less Crime. These are two very different people.

Straight as an arrow I tells ya! He's not thinking about pretty Mexican boys, no siree!
Then leader Trent Lott, told Hastert....(Your not throwing this sh@t in my lap Dennie). It was Trent Lott that was instrumental in saving Bill Clinton from being removed from office. Why?
It was then, a little reported story about Hillary’s rifling through hundreds of FBI files that she insisted for months she had no knowledge of, mysteriously showing up in the residence quarters of the white house.
In these FBI files was the dirt on political adversaries of then president Bill Clinton that Hillary was searching.
One such report as to why Trent Lott bowed to pressure from the white house was a lil story of Trents lil fling with a 18 year old male.
Basically, Trent was attempting to keep this story from hitting the MSM. Scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours....The white house and Trent Lott both got what they sought, a preservation of their power.
My good friend, the Senator from Mississippi, swore an oath to up hold the constitution and the law of this land. I think the good people of Mississippi need to recall this man...
Let’s hope not, it would be hard to beat him in the primary.
Lott is for Lott.
He is a linguini spined go along to get allong to STAY IN PERSONAL POWER period. He would rather lead as a minority leader than be a follower in the majority.
What hour of the Show was this call?
There seems to be a real disconnect here.
Since when are Senators and Congressmen elected to go to Washington to do anything other than what the vast majority of their constituents want?
Since when are they sent to Washington to do what they personally feel is right?
They run on planks of a platform in the form of campaign promises and then when elected...do whatever they damned well please. Essentially moving with the cash flow.
High time the Executive and Judicial branches start to take notice and do something because these jackasses certainly have not proven themselves capable of policing their own behavior....most of it outright criminal.
Time for tar and feathers to make a comeback.
Bush was a cheerleader too.
Sissy is as sissy does. No backbone.
Bush might get Impeached by both parties; will conservatives defend him? At least Cheney has a pair.
Answer that and you'll know who Lott is beholden to.
Illegals: Representation without taxation
Citizens: Taxation without representation
Lott knows there is a lot of opposition but, like so many other traitors, wants to pass it anyway.
If that's true, then, this is a helluva way to do it.
Should this travesty pass, I wonder if we'll get as many groveling apologies as the civil rights pimps got.
Just because Lott is an A$$hole, don’t mean that I believe every little innuendo or charge against him because someone made it on the Internet.
You ought to source your allegations, or take a walk.
Rush is absolutely right. This is the Destroy the Republican Party Comprehensively Act. If it is passed and signed by Bush, I will remain a Conservative but I will cease to be a Republican. Where will I go? I don’t know; maybe I’ll just stop voting. The Dims will take over in any case.
Nothing against cowboys or cowboy hats (I own two Stetsons), but sometimes there's more hat than cowboy...
>>More than that I think he is trying to redeem himself from the joke he told at Strom Thurmond’s 150th birthday party.<<
Did you hear clips of his speech back then? It was not a joke. He was not trying to be funny at all.
Actually I didn’t. I only read about it in the news.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.