Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lowbridge

If so, why wasn’t Armitage charged with an actual crime? This is BS


3 posted on 05/29/2007 3:43:23 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Fred Thompson in 2008 - there is no doubt about it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NonValueAdded
More to the point, why wasn't Joe Wilson charged with the crime?
8 posted on 05/29/2007 3:45:26 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: NonValueAdded
"If so, why wasn’t Armitage charged with an actual crime? This is BS."

Because Armitage didn't fit into Fitz's conspiracy theory. Fitz the moron was totally bamboozled by Wilson.
12 posted on 05/29/2007 3:51:52 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle ("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson