I also have thought of easy, cheap, methods terrorists could use to cause great damage to lives and property within the U.S.
I have not yet voiced them. But I am starting to wonder if I should. Having authorities possibly come up with contingency plans before an attack, or prevention of an actual attack, could save many lives.
To me, the issue here isn’t one of concern for security. Like so many other phrases, such as “It’s for the children,” this is meant to mask the real purpose of the idea: more revenue.
I’m sure that this will continue to be floated as a “safety” and “Homeland Security” concern. What they really want is that $100 license fee that the State will charge you.
Anyone who complains is obviously not in favor of “safety” or “Homeland Security...”
Perhaps they’ll make us take our shoes off before we get in our boats?