[VeniVidiVici]

Amazing. They told us we were ignorant and had the bill all wrong. But it seems a lot of the amendments are to address the concerns of people who feel our reps are GIVING this country away.

They have some good stuff in there *IF* we are forced to have a bill at all. But they need to kill the anchor baby rule and have ironclad regs in place to make sure these people don’t jump the citizenship line. They also need to toughen laws concerning identity theft and fraud committed by illegals.

Billing their home countries for tax-payer covered services is a must too.

Plus a host of other things I’m sure I’m forgetting.

[chicagolady]

GREAT LINK!!

http://www.outsourcecongress.org/outsource/congress/schstaffers.html

[K-oneTexas]

You are so right on that one.

Comments on Amendments by number for those not specific in what the amendment does:
1.Adds additional rights (child advocates, permanent protection, protection against abuse) and authorizes appropriations for this amendments (6).

2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 10. Space holder for future filing.

It's amazing many refer back to #1. Or are holding a space for future action.


If the original compromise is this bad in that it needs 108 amendments ... then that tells me it's a no-go. We need to start over with a blank sheet of paper.

First step is to determine which laws now on the books are 'bad' and need to be repelled.

Second step is to act on those laws on the books which are the 'good' ones and enforce them and in the case of the fence build it.

Third step is to hold an emergency election today and "throw all da bums out"! (I'd keep them there to figure it out but why throw good money after bad.) It's apparent they are not earning their keep.