[T'wit]

>> He released her to be cremated as fast as the law allowed. The test results were not even in yet. In doing so, he allowed for no second chance, just as he did when he rejected any independent observers at the autopsy itself. I find it odd that he did all of that when he said that in a case "of criminal importance" beforehand

You were right about this, bjs1779. I understand there are pre- or post-mortem tests so sophisticated they can detect signs of strangulation in soft tissues, even 14 years later. Dr. Thogmartin blundered by releasing the body for cremation in a case "of criminal importance." The body may well have contained clues.

[bjs1779]

Dr. Thogmartin blundered by releasing the body for cremation in a case "of criminal importance." The body may well have contained clues.

Remember when he said it was a "classic case of sickle cell trait" AFTER the video of Martin Anderson was released? I don't think there is much doubt that he would've allowed his body to cremated, video or no video. The list of irregularities is rather long.