Who ruled out a soft tissue injury? And who cares if it "goes with" Dr. Hammesfahr's finding? I do not represent Dr. Hammesfahr.
Dr. Hammesfahr did not "claim" a vertebral injury anyway. He suggested the possibility of one. According to the autopsy report years later, there was none. Question closed. That is exactly why we turn our attention to the possibility of a soft-tissue injury.
Dr Hammesfahr specifically said vertebral and cord injuries. I don't see anyway you can prove there was a soft tissue injury at the time.
And who cares if it "goes with" Dr. Hammesfahr's finding? I do not represent Dr. Hammesfahr.
My mistake. You quoted him often and seemed to rely on his testimony. He was the only doctor I noted who claimed there was a neck injury of any kind, which you accepted despite other docs saying her neck rigidity was decerbrate rigidity. I can't remember if it was you or bjs1779 who were upset when I pointed out his known lie about being a Nobel prize nominee.