FYI...thought folks here on FR with any naval leanings would be interested in this news and the accompanying pictures.
1 posted on
05/27/2007 10:19:10 PM PDT by
Jeff Head
To: joanie-f; Dukie; Squantos; JohnHuang2; RobFromGa; k.trujillo; Travis McGee; jim macomber; ...
FYI, latest news and pics on Republic of Korea AEGIS vessel.
2 posted on
05/27/2007 10:20:12 PM PDT by
Jeff Head
(Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
To: Jeff Head
3 posted on
05/27/2007 10:20:40 PM PDT by
Fiddlstix
(Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
To: Jeff Head
I’m no expert, but that sure seems like a heck of a lot of armament for a ship that size.
5 posted on
05/27/2007 10:28:22 PM PDT by
Hugin
(Mecca delenda est.)
To: Jeff Head
With an 80 cell VLS grouping forward dedicated to SM-2 missiles, and a 48 cell VLS grouping aft carrying 32 land attack cruise missiles and 16 ASROC anti-submarine missiles. In addition, the vessel carries 16 anti-shipping missiles very similar to harpoon missiles, a rolling air frame (RAM) missile launcher with 21 short range anti-missile and anti-air missiles, and a 30mm Goalkeeper CIWS for more close in protection. Finally, the vessel carries 32 light weight topredoes and carries two anti-submarine helicopters in its hangarsI'm grinning from ear to ear as I read how this ship literally bristles with weaponry!!
A total of 80 med-long range defensive missiles (SM-2), 32 land attack cruise missiles, 16 asrocs, 16 anti-shipping missiles, 32 light torpedoes :-) :-) :-) :-)
In ideal conditions this one ship can really wreak havoc among the oceans of commies!!
Btw what is the comparative layout armament for the US destroyers?
6 posted on
05/27/2007 10:37:04 PM PDT by
prophetic
To: Jeff Head
Congratulations, glad to have her around...
7 posted on
05/27/2007 10:42:32 PM PDT by
JasonC
To: Jeff Head
Nice! I’m guessing they have room for more weapons because the intended mission is more regional defense of South Korea than the global missions of US ships (more missiles, less fuel tankage). But that’s just a guess.
8 posted on
05/27/2007 10:54:09 PM PDT by
omnivore
To: Jeff Head
Two thoughts:
I bet they didn’t spend a billion and a half dollars building it.
And I consider anything with a 10,000 ton displacement a cruiser.
12 posted on
05/28/2007 1:04:00 AM PDT by
PAR35
To: TigerLikesRooster
New South Korean boat in the water
15 posted on
05/28/2007 2:54:16 AM PDT by
Tainan
(Talk is cheap. Silence is golden. All I got is brass...lotsa brass.)
To: Jeff Head
Any indication of range and endurance?
20 posted on
05/28/2007 4:53:19 AM PDT by
Dundee
(They gave up all their tomorrows for our today's.)
To: Jeff Head
Kimmie is either going to announce building his own midget ship or launch a few dozen missiles AGAIN!
Personally I hope the AEGIS “destroyer” is moved into a position to shoot down those missiles.
27 posted on
05/28/2007 8:54:55 AM PDT by
Otaku6
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson