Last night, someone posted an article from the NYTimes on how it things might get worse if we left Iraq. While most freepers were surprised, I postulated that the Times was trying to give the Dems cover after the Iraq vote, because their far left base was going crazy over the vote.
Now it turns out yesterday the rabid left is revolting. The sad thing is that the Times’ agenda would be so transparent.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1840370/posts
No more than they always are.
Well, duuuuhhh!
;-)