[Gideon Reader]

With all due respect,...
Please, clarify your point for me.
Are you saying that the victim of this criminal RELIGOUS assault and his family, and by extension ALL Sikhs are enablers or have caused the offense to be committed by not having sufficiently assimilated into American society?

Are you further implying that the Muslims who performed these criminal acts were justified because of the outwardly identifying religious practices of the Sikh boy?

If it were a Roman Catholic boy who was wearing a crucifix, or an Observant Jewish boy who was wearing a kippa or any Christian boy/girl displaying any symbol of their faith, it would be OK to assault them?

The stated circumstances of this putrid offense, appears to be a blatant hate crime, wherein the victim was targeted based on religous grounds with a clearly stated purpose to intimidate and press the superiority of one religion over another. To be clear Islam is certainly NOT superior to the religion practiced by the Sikhs or any other religion, and may not be nearly as civilized as many it seeks to subjugate.

[DieHard the Hunter]

It was clearly a hate crime, based upon Religion and perpetrated by a member of a religious death cult that is world-famous for hate crimes — otherwise known as Jihads. No question about it.

Militant Islam is a hate cult and a disgrace to the rest of Islam.

[gotribe]

Goes without saying the muslims are trash. But all must assimilate. Find a more subtle way to express your religion.