That was debunked years ago, they were dinosaur tracks, not human.
"Do not believe the Roman Coins with dragon depictions on them.
Some dragons look like funny dinosaurs, some look like funny snakes, some look like nothing possibly alive on Earth (unless there were six limbed dinosaurs).
I'm sure that if we found pictures of unicorns somewhere that would be evidence that they existed. Especially if the pictures were found on something official. Well I'll be jiggered, Britain has a unicorn on their Royal Coat of Arms.
"Do not believe the Inca Stones with depictions of dragons on them. Or the fact that the skin pattern depicted was only recently verified.
I've seen reports that they are a fraud.
I've also seen pictures of minotaurs, griffins and jackal gods engraved in stone.
"As to you belief that they went extinct before the flood is unknown. That is assuming you even believe in the Flood of Noah's day.
If a global flood the size of that portrayed in the Bible happened as little as 4000 years ago we should be able to predict what physical evidence would be left. We have found mountains of physical evidence but none of it points to a global flood. It just didn't happen.
What evidence we do find is that the majority of dinos went extinct within a few million years of the Chicxulub impact. Those that remained were of the bird 'kind'. We find no dino fossils in with human fossils. Even if they never lived side by side so we shouldn't find the fossils together we should be able to find them within the same level of strata giving a similar relative age, or find them in layers which date the same through radiometric dating. Yet the dinosaurs, no matter where they are found are between layers consistently dated much older than those layers which sandwich human fossils. Unless the type of fossils themselves affect the dating of the layers surrounding them, even if you doubt the absolute date, the relative difference in dates is unquestionable.
"Before the flood things lived longer and grew larger. After the flood things did not live as long therefore did not grow as large.
This is pure conjecture on your part. There is no evidence that organisms lived longer in the past than they do now. The rate of growth in the plexiform perichondral bone in dinosaur skeletons grew rapidly suggesting that even the oldest did not live more than 50 or 60 years.
"It is a scientific fact that reptiles grow until they die. So pre flood larger, post flood smaller.
Even the fastest growing reptile, growing at a couple dozen grams a day would take centuries to reach the size of a large elephant let alone a large dinosaur. The reason reptiles continue to grow for such a length of time is because they have extremely slow metabolisms. Later dinos such as TRex were more closely related to birds than to crocs. Birds have quite fast metabolisms. They do not grow throughout their entire lives. Sauropods and theropods had pneumatic vertebrae, shortened stiffened dorsal columns and mobile abdominal ribs as well as other features shared with birds but not reptiles.
If you want accurate analogs to dinosaurs look to birds not extant reptiles.
"There are many legends (which is not a scientific fact, same as evolution is not scientific but a hypothesis on unproved ideals) of dinosaurs seem by tribal people in South America and Africa.
Are you sure all those legends are talking about the same animal?
Legends are not evidence for anything but the imagination of human beings.
Would you mind explaining to me why the existence of dinosaurs at the same time as humans would lend support to the Biblical flood, or be evidence against evolution?
bump