[Dog Gone]

It is speculation on many that if the animals were baby's at the time of the flood they would eat less, sleep longer during their 1 year stay on the ark. This would allow for more animals kinds, which would repopulate the earth with different varieties as populations became isolated as ice melted and continent masses became defined.

You seem to be suggesting that glaciers and large ice masses would somehow survive a one year global flood. Can you point to any undewater glaciers that we have today to support that contention?

While you're at it, give me the biblical timetable where Noah dropped off the marsupials on Australia, the bison in North America, a few monkeys in both central america and Africa, before first spotting dry land at Ararat.

My version of the bible is really skimpy on those necessary details.

[b_sharp]

"While you're at it, give me the biblical timetable where Noah dropped off the marsupials on Australia, the bison in North America, a few monkeys in both central america and Africa, before first spotting dry land at Ararat."

They didn't have to get dropped off. At the time of the flood the only continent was Pangaea so they could have sauntered their way home. The continents as we see them today got that way within just a few years of the flood. Just ask Walt Brown, he 'knows'.

[Creationist]

It is real simple if you believe that the Bible is 100% true.

First much of the flood water was frozen around the globe in many areas. This made the ocean levels lower, which made many land and Ice bridges.

You will note that there are many coastal citys of old that are now underwater.

[Creationist]

The Ice came after the flood.