i beleive you are misconstruing my statement. I did not say creationism is based on science. That is your wording. Go back and read my original 2 sentence comment and tell me where it is wrong or why it offends you so.
I have all my graduate and post-graduate studies in the sciences and make my living in the sciences. So please do not assume me to have a “lack of knowledge about science”. It is your pomposity that is facile and invalid.
Good day sir!
Lets see... Your original two sentence comment in post 41 that you desire me to read was: “real science is not on the side of evolution. It is still only a theory.”
Which implies a significant misunderstanding of what a scientific theory is. I pointed that out. You replied in 114 “yea... so what is wrong with my statement?”
You then threw in the snide “I didn’t realize until you pointed it out just how stupid I really am. I will certainly run all my comments and thoughts by you prior to any future posts. Thank you. You’ve opened my eyes.” I assumed not stupidity, but simple lack of knowledge. If, however, you truly did “graduate and post-graduate” work in the sciences, and “make your living in the sciences” and still do not understand what a scientific theory is, I may have to revise my assumption.
I did not say creationism is based on science. That is your wording
Where did you find me saying that?