Oh, that’s right, you guys like to start with everything already existing and just ‘evolving’.
Nope. Scientists don’t make unwarranted assumptions. Science is still looking for the answer of creation. They don’t believe it will be found in ancient fables though. They keep an open mind about such things. I guess that’s why religion appeals to so many. Someones scribblings can be declared the final word on a subject and no further analysis needs to be applied.
” They don’t believe it will be found in ancient fables though. They keep an open mind about such things.”
I’m sorry, but I find that statement incongruous. It’s nonsensical.
Nope. Scientists don’t make unwarranted assumptions. Science is still looking for the answer of creation. They don’t believe it will be found in ancient fables though. They keep an open mind about such things. I guess that’s why religion appeals to so many. Someones scribblings can be declared the final word on a subject and no further analysis needs to be applied.
No, a scientist has to work with God has given him to work with, creation.
The evolutionist wants to work with the given and ignore the ultimate question, how did anything get here.
As for those scribblings, they are far more accurate than anything that any evolutionist has conjectured about.
A evolutionists is not basing his views on objective factual science, since there is no evidence for evolution.
Nothing is moving from one species to another higher one.
Nothing has been found in the fossil record that shows anything like that ever occuring.
So the evolutionist is left with his faith, that the Bible is wrong and he is right, and the hope that there is no final judgement.
Uh, how's that going?