Really? OK, I'll show you just a tiny bit of evidence for evolution, and provide a link to more. Then you show me some evidence for a global flood at about 4350 years ago.
First the link: Patrick Henry's Un-Missing Links.
Now, here is some evidence. I await some evidence of a global flood.
Site: Koobi Fora (Upper KBS tuff, area 104), Lake Turkana, Kenya (4, 1)
Discovered By: B. Ngeneo, 1975 (1)
Estimated Age of Fossil: 1.75 mya * determined by Stratigraphic, faunal, paleomagnetic & radiometric data (1, 4)
Species Name: Homo ergaster (1, 7, 8), Homo erectus (3, 4, 7), Homo erectus ergaster (25)
Gender: Female (species presumed to be sexually dimorphic) (1, 8)
Cranial Capacity: 850 cc (1, 3, 4)
Information: Tools found in same layer (8, 9). Found with KNM-ER 406 A. boisei (effectively eliminating single species hypothesis) (1)
Interpretation: Adult (based on cranial sutures, molar eruption and dental wear) (1)
See original source for notes:
Source: http://www.mos.org/evolution/fossils/fossilview.php?fid=33
Source: http://wwwrses.anu.edu.au/environment/eePages/eeDating/HumanEvol_info.html
Those are not proofs of anything.
They are assumptions based on evolutionary myths.
Now, stop wasting my time.
You guys are always bringing out some bogus bone or skull and claiming it is a link in the chain to human beings.
Show me how life can come from non-life.
Show me a species in the fossils record that is truely in a stage of transition from one species to a higher one.
Stop trying to peddle that nonsense as science.
Creationists have generally claimed that there is nothing in H. erectus specimens which is outside the range of human variation.4 This seems to be confirmed by evidence of their artifacts and, thus, behaviour. I.e. they are likely to have been just another type of human resulting from the sudden burst of genetic diversification after Babel. A previously intermarrying gene pool was broken rapidly into isolated subsets.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v24/i4/skulls.asp