Evolutionists are full of assumptions, just like Creationists.
We operate from a different paradigm and deal with the data accordingly.
Both schools have scientists, and come to the same conclusion when dealing with objective evidence.
What they disagree with is over the implications of the evidence.
I am always willing to learn something new. That separates me from the practitioners of creation "science."
Now, where is the evidence that radiocarbon dates older than 6,000 years are inaccurate?