[Coyoteman]

Sorry bud, nothing that the evolutionists have come up has proven anything older than 6,000 years-period-and you know it!

So stop making claims that you know are not true.

Typical evolutionist assertions with no facts to support them

How about all those radiocarbon dates older than 6,000 years? I have obtained quite a few of those myself.

Not to mention all the other evidence.

[fortheDeclaration]

Sorry bud, nothing that the evolutionists have come up has proven anything older than 6,000 years-period-and you know it! So stop making claims that you know are not true. Typical evolutionist assertions with no facts to support them How about all those radiocarbon dates older than 6,000 years? I have obtained quite a few of those myself. Not to mention all the other evidence.

As you well know, the dating methods are very suspect

The radiometric dating methods are based on those same naturalistic, uniformitarian, anti-biblical assumptions and there is plenty of published evidence that they do not give valid dates. Besides the RATE research mentioned earlier, consider the well-researched arguments in The Mythology of Modern Dating Methods. You cannot expect this icon of evolution to be overthrown in a few short paragraphs.

http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/feedback/2006/0303.asp

[fortheDeclaration]

Mythology of Modern Dating Methods (The)
by John Woodmorappe
SKU: 10-3-090
List Price: $12.99
Price: $12.99
Publisher: Institute for Creation Research
Published: 1999
A masterful demonstration of the fallacy of radioactive dating assumptions and techniques with citations of almost 500 articles by evolutionists. A solid refutation of the belief that radiometric dating proves the Earth is old.
Woodmorappe
10-3-090
radiometric
dating
radiation
radioactive
carbon
dating
http://www.answersingenesis.org/PublicStore/product/Mythology-of-Modern-Dating-Methods-The,4612,226.aspx