Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State's transportation needs pose problems
Valley Press on ^ | Friday, May 25, 2007. | ALLISON GATLIN

Posted on 05/25/2007 9:54:37 AM PDT by BenLurkin

With an exploding population and aging and inadequate infrastructure, California faces questions of how best to meet its transportation needs for its long-term economic survival.

To accomplish this, multiple modes of transportation - not only highways, but also rail and air - must be considered in the long-term, Ken Secor told members of the Mojave Chamber of Commerce on Thursday afternoon.

One option under consideration for the movement of people is a high-speed rail system linking the state's major population centers in Los Angeles and San Francisco through the burgeoning Central Valley.

The California High-Speed Rail Authority has proposed a 700-mile system using electric trains traveling as fast as 200 mph or more to whisk travelers from Los Angeles to San Francisco in 2½ hours.

The proposed route would include stops in Palmdale, Bakersfield and Fresno as well as segments into Orange County, San Diego and Sacramento.

Between Palmdale and Bakersfield, the proposed route would run through new tunnels in the Tehachapi Mountains.

Animation shown by Secor of the proposed train running through the wind farms in the hills west of Mojave drew cheers from those assembled.

The system proposed for California is the type of steel wheel on steel rail technology in routine use in those countries, not the more exotic magnetic levitation - also known as maglev - technology that is in use in Japan as a demonstration project and in other areas, Secor said.

Chief among the obstacles to the high-speed rail plan is the high cost of initial construction, now estimated at $40 billion.

Then there is the issue of ridership.

"California's population is resistant to mass transit," Secor said. "Resistant is a mild term."

(Excerpt) Read more at avpress.com ...


TOPICS: US: California
KEYWORDS: allisongatlin; caltransportation; highspeedrail; transportation

1 posted on 05/25/2007 9:54:38 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
So on one hand high speed rail is prohibitively expensive to build but on the other hand, hardly anyone is interested in riding on it.

What California really needs is more freeways.

2 posted on 05/25/2007 9:55:20 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

What California really needs is fewer freeloaders.


3 posted on 05/25/2007 10:05:05 AM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Argus

Why not build a.......................MONORAIL?


4 posted on 05/25/2007 10:22:01 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Since the population is soon to peak if it has not done so already, I’d say continued failure to fix the worst roads in the US (we’ve got ‘em!) will only speed the exodus. California is the rust belt of the 21st century.


5 posted on 05/25/2007 11:49:51 AM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD
I don’t believe we have the worst roads in the U.S..
6 posted on 05/25/2007 12:27:14 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
California liberals have no interest in building new freeways.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

7 posted on 05/25/2007 4:46:13 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

When you take a train from A to B, you’re still stuck at B waiting an hour for an hour bus ride to get to your real destination. Then if you want to run any errands while you’re in the area, you get to wait for another bus, plus schlep your crap with you. Any surprise people are “resistant” to that?


8 posted on 05/25/2007 6:24:10 PM PDT by John Jorsett (scam never sleeps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The only people who really like “mass transit” are pointy-headed “urban planners” with government jobs (or academic positions with government contracts to do “studies” on mass transit).


9 posted on 05/25/2007 6:35:42 PM PDT by omnivore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Tell me where they are worse. Of the places I’ve been, Cali has the worst, over all.


10 posted on 05/30/2007 5:30:54 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson