Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rameumptom

Mitt is a RINO. The AWB reference supports his lack of leadership by not vetoing it on principle alone. He signed it, based reports from you pro RINO folks because he knew it would have been overridden. You Mitt supporters claim Mitt had to work with the Liberal controlled houses of government, therefore his programs were impeded. This shows his lack of leadership, POTUS Reagan had the same obstacles and lead this nation in spite of them.

Then Mitt passed Romney Care where the public is forced to by medical insurance. A real conservative program, NOT.

He will cave to the Liberals just like he did in Mass.


16 posted on 05/25/2007 7:49:48 AM PDT by tiger-one (The night has a thousand eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tiger-one

“Then Mitt passed Romney Care where the public is forced to by medical insurance. A real conservative program, NOT.”

As opposed to the taxpayers picking up the tab for the deadbeats who take advantage of free medical care, you mean?


19 posted on 05/25/2007 8:08:29 AM PDT by tabsternager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: tiger-one
Mitt is a RINO.

Well, it depends on what your definition of RINO is, I guess. If it means you have to agree with him 100% then all the top tier (and some in the lower tier) are RINOs too, including Rudy (abortion,guns,gays), McCain (CFR,immigration,Gang of 14,Gitmo) and Fred Thompson(Immigration,CFR,tort reform,lobbyists).

The bottomline is that Mitt governed conservatively in Massachusetts in spite of some RINOish statements in the past.

23 posted on 05/25/2007 10:20:32 AM PDT by redgirlinabluestate (MittReport.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: tiger-one

>>>Then Mitt passed Romney Care where the public is forced to by medical insurance. A real conservative program, NOT.<<<

The public is not forced to buy medical insurance under the plan passed in Massachusetts. Do your homework next time.


37 posted on 08/05/2007 10:34:03 PM PDT by CheyennePress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: tiger-one
This shows his lack of leadership, POTUS Reagan had the same obstacles and lead this nation in spite of them.

President Reagan give us ONE good Supreme Court Judge and TWO terrible Supreme Court judges. Bush has given us TWO good Supreme Court judges.

Ronald Reagan gave us AMNESTY FOR ALL ILLEGALS IN 1986. Bush tried to do the same and failed. Perhaps he'd have succeeded if he called it AMNESTY, like Ronald Reagan did. Reagan was honest about what he did here. Bush and McCain lied repeatedly about their bill not being amnesty.

Ronald Reagan cut-and-ran from Lebanon after the terrorists killed over 250 of our bravest.

Ronald Reagan RAISED the corporate SS tax rate. George Bush got us tax CUTS.

Pull your head out of your a-hole for once and actually put these things into proper perspective.

RONALD MAGNUS REAGAN WAS A RINO ON A NUMBER OF ISSUES TOO. Unless you consider amnesty, raising taxes and judges who ignore and invent new meanings in the Constitution to be some Conserrvative values. McCain, is that you?

But thank God all you Reagan worshippers are here to straighten us out on what a Conservative is.

SO ALL YOU SINGLE ISSUE HUCKLEBEE VOTERS, TELL ME WHY THE HELL I SHOULD BELIEVE MCCAIN OR HUCKLEBEE WILL BE BETTER THAN BUSH ON JUDGES? You all seem to worship the ground Reagan walked upon, but for some reason cannot bring yourselves to realize that Reagan was FAR from an ideal Conservative when it came to judges. Especially since ABORTION is the ONLY issue that you all seem to care about.

55 posted on 02/06/2008 4:19:07 PM PST by Diplomat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson