I see we are in agreement, then. Scientists (your 'designers', I'm assuming), being human, are as subject to Santa's naughty and nice lists as the rest of us. Science (your 'systemize knowledge') doesn't care in the least about whether we think the knowledge gained through it is good or evil. Thinking otherwise is tantamount to expecting facts to be guilted into changing themselves so that they match what we want them to be instead of accurately depicting what is.
Back to that Genesis knower, he knew very much of the knowledge of good and evil, and the result of that 'garden party' left two in human flesh with the knowledge that they were without clothing and thus they sewed fig leaves together to cover their nakedness. No the event did not occur (no matter what the religionists claim) in an apple orchard, but a fig grove.
I honestly have no idea what point you are trying to make with that paragraph.
Santa is a good symbol to describe the idea of evolution. Yes, I know that is not what you intended me to take from using Santa, but it sure works, given the myth of Santa.
I am saying specifically that the designers of the systemize knowledge commonly referred to as the Theory of Evolution are not the least bit interested in depicting what is. The designers have a vested interested in protecting their system, cleverly labeled as science. Their system is what keeps them fittest in the process of surviving same as many in the religious sphere taking a few scriptures or portions thereof to maintain their survival. The TOE system is god of their own divining and no other gods shall come before them, not even the Creator of their very souls.
That is their choice and not really my objection, what I do object to is their tyrannical control over what we the tax payers are required to tithe so their houses of their god can be funded, the public school system. There is no one above them to ever hold them to account for what the public school system produces. These fittest will willingly ignore all manner of perversion and degradation within their house of worship so long as they maintain their funding.
The big deception is that evolution got a classification as legitimate science, or what some consider intelligent thought. I do not mean to excluded other prominent deceptions, say that some claim the Bible dates this earth at 6,000 years, when in fact no such scripture exists, and the whole Book points out continually that this earth is very very old. I could list many other deceptions that are simply not found to be what is within the Bible, I just selected one that is on topic. I mentioned what the Bible says in Genesis of the knower of the knowledge of good and evil because it also rarely gets an accurate depiction of what is actually said.