Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman
"You can't properly hate a group until you can come up with some suitably derogatory name for them."

So --- to tone down the [ahem] discussion, then labeling those whom disagree with some point of view or another, should be avoided?

That is, unless one's aim is to express hatred, albeit as daggers, at first hidden among what argument is otherwise reasonable.

We've all seen plenty of that sort of behavior around here. Those portions of the going-ons, never fail to bring more heat than light, regardless of who is wielding the blades.

18 posted on 05/24/2007 8:02:11 PM PDT by BlueDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: BlueDragon
So --- to tone down the [ahem] discussion, then labeling those whom disagree with some point of view or another, should be avoided?

Pejoratives should be avoided, yes.

"Darwinist" is a pejorative. So is "Cretard." Neither is helpful in a rational discussion.

Folks slip up sometimes, but those terms should be avoided in a reasoned debate.

20 posted on 05/24/2007 8:21:58 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: BlueDragon

Just to be clear, the only “namecalling” here hs been done by those who do not understand evolution, using the term “Darwinist” as a pejorative.

Seems kind of one sided to me.


23 posted on 05/24/2007 9:48:36 PM PDT by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson